首页|替雷利珠单抗联合化疗药物治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效及对血清肿瘤标志物的影响探讨

替雷利珠单抗联合化疗药物治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效及对血清肿瘤标志物的影响探讨

扫码查看
目的 探讨替雷利珠单抗联合化疗药物治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的临床疗效及对血清肿瘤标志物水平的影响。方法 回顾性分析 106 例晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的临床资料,根据治疗方法不同分为对照组(吉西他滨单药治疗)和观察组(吉西他滨联合替雷利珠单抗治疗),每组 53 例。观察并比较两组患者临床疗效、药物不良反应发生情况以及治疗前后健康状况调查简表(SF-36)评分和糖类抗原125(CA125)、癌胚抗原(CEA)、神经特异性烯化酶(NSE)水平。结果 观察组疾病缓解率(92。5%)明显高于对照组(77。4%)(P<0。05)。观察组患者治疗前的SF-36 评分为(48。57±3。56)分,治疗后SF-36 评分为(86。34±5。32)分;对照组患者治疗前的SF-36评分为(48。61±3。58)分,治疗后SF-36评分为(63。28±4。63)分。与治疗前比较,两组患者治疗后的SF-36 评分均有明显改善,且与对照组治疗后比较,观察组患者治疗后的SF-36 评分明显更高(P<0。05)。观察组患者治疗前CA125 为(105。86±5。29)U/ml,CEA为(65。76±0。23)μg/L,NSE为(38。56±2。30)ng/ml,治疗后CA125为(32。92±2。38)U/ml,CEA为(16。85±2。23)μg/L,NSE为(6。54±1。67)ng/ml;对照组患者治疗前CA125 为(105。88±5。30)U/ml,CEA为(65。79±0。25)μg/L,NSE为(38。62±2。31)ng/ml,治疗后CA125为(63。32±2。31)U/ml,CEA为(29。27±2。29)μg/L,NSE为(22。15±1。88)ng/ml。治疗前,两组患者血清CA125、CEA、NSE水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0。05);与治疗前比较,两组患者治疗后血清CA125、CEA、NSE水平均有所降低,且与对照组治疗后比较,观察组患者治疗后血清CA125、CEA、NSE水平明显更低(P<0。05)。治疗过程中,与对照组(20。8%)比较,观察组患者药物不良反应发生率(3。8%)显著降低(P<0。05)。结论 晚期肺癌患者经替雷利珠单抗与化药联合治疗后临床症状明显得到改善,临床总有效率显著升高,血清中肿瘤标志物水平降低,患者的生活质量水平得到提高,且治疗过程中发生的药物不良反应明显降低。
Efficacy of tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer and its influence on serum tumor markers
Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC)and its influence on serum tumor markers.Methods The clinical data of 106 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer were retrospectively analyzed,and they were divided into a control group(gemcitabine monotherapy)and an observation group(gemcitabine combined with tislelizumab)according to different treatment methods,with 53 cases in each group.Observation and comparison were made on clinical efficacy,occurrence of adverse drug reactions,36-item short-form health survey(SF-36)score,carbohydrate antigen 125(CA125),carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA),and neuron-specific enolase(NSE)levels before and after treatment.Results The remission rate of disease in the observation group(92.5%)was significantly higher than that in the control group(77.4%)(P<0.05).In the observation group,the SF-36 score was(48.57±3.56)points before treatment and(86.34±5.32)points after treatment.In the control group,the SF-36 score was(48.61±3.58)points before treatment and(63.28±4.63)points after treatment.Compared with before treatment,the SF-36 scores in both groups improved significantly after treatment,and the SF-36 score in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group after treatment(P<0.05).In the observation group,CA125 was(105.86±5.29)U/ml,CEA was(65.76±0.23)μg/L,and NSE was(38.56±2.30)ng/ml before treatment,and after treatment,CA125 was(32.92±2.38)U/ml,CEA was(16.85±2.23)μg/L,and NSE was(6.54±1.67)ng/ml.In the control group,CA125 was(105.88±5.30)U/ml,CEA was(65.79±0.25)μg/L,and NSE was(38.62±2.31)ng/ml before treatment,and after treatment,CA125 was(63.32±2.31)U/ml,CEA was(29.27±2.29)μg/L,and NSE was(22.15±1.88)ng/ml.Before treatment,there was no significant difference in serum CA125,CEA and NSE levels between the two groups(P>0.05).Compared with before treatment,the serum CA125,CEA and NSE levels in both groups decreased after treatment;compared with the control group,the serum CA125,CEA and NSE levels in the observation group were significantly low after treatment(P<0.05).During treatment,the incidence of adverse drug reactions in the observation group(3.8%)was significantly lower than that in the control group(20.8%)(P<0.05).Conclusion In patients with advanced lung cancer,the combination of tislelizumab and chemotherapy can significantly improve the clinical symptoms of patients,significantly increase the total clinical response rate,reduce the level of serum tumor markers,improve the quality of life of patients,and significantly reduce the adverse drug reactions during treatment.

TislelizumabGemcitabineAdvanced lung cancerClinical efficacy

李星辉、朱平香

展开 >

342500 瑞金市人民医院肿瘤内科

342500 瑞金市妇幼保健院药剂科

替雷利珠单抗 吉西他滨 晚期肺癌 临床疗效

2024

中国现代药物应用
中国水利电力医学科学技术学会

中国现代药物应用

影响因子:0.862
ISSN:1673-9523
年,卷(期):2024.18(7)
  • 12