Analysis of application effect of prefabricated fiber posts in oral restoration treatment
Objective To explore the effect of prefabricated fiber posts in oral restoration treatment.Methods 78 patients who underwent oral restoration treatment were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group,with 39 patients in each group.The observation group was restored by prefabricated fiber posts,and the control group was restored by plastic fiber posts.Comparison was made on periodontal health indicators[plaque index(PLI),bleeding index(BI),probing depth(PD)]at different time points[before surgery(T0),3 months after surgery(T1),and 6 months after surgery(T2)],bite force,masticatory efficiency,success rate of restoration,restoration time,levels of inflammatory factors[interleukin-17(IL-17),interleukin-23(IL-23)]before and after restoration,and complications between the two groups.Results(i)At T1,the observation group had PLI of(1.90±0.22)points,BI of(2.01±0.33)points and PD of(1.21±0.45)mm,which were significantly lower than(2.11±0.26)points,(2.86±0.32)points and(1.51±0.53)mm in the control group(t=3.851,11.548,2.695;P<0.05).At T2,the observation group had PLI of(0.83±0.23)points,BI of(0.87±0.34)points,and PD of(0.55±0.49)mm,which were significantly lower than(1.65±0.29)points,(1.55±0.35)points,and(1.05±0.30)mm in the control group(t=13.835,8.703,5.435;P<0.05).(ii)The complication rate of the observation group was 2.56%,which was lower than the control group's 17.95%(P<0.05).(iii)At T1,the bite force of(111.51±7.14)lbs and masticatory efficiency of(73.35±5.01)%in the observation group were significantly higher than(94.01±7.46)lbs and(65.35±4.96)%in the control group(t=10.583,7.087;P<0.05).At T2,the bite force of(133.35±10.01)lbs and masticatory efficiency of(88.86±7.53)%in the observation group were significantly higher than(114.53±18.46)lbs and(77.01±8.02)%in the control group(t=5.597,6.727;P<0.05).(iv)After restoration,the observation group had IL-17 of(300.84±13.73)ng/L and IL-23 of(6.29±2.16)μg/L,which were lower than(353.26±10.47)ng/L and(7.65±2.47)μg/L in the control group(t=18.959,2.588;P<0.05).The restoration time of the observation group was(65.28±3.51)min per tooth,which was shorter than the control group's(100.24±6.61)min per tooth(t=29.172,P<0.05).The success rate of restoration in the observation group was 97.44%,which was higher than 79.49%in the control group(χ2=6.155,P<0.05).Conclusion Prefabricated fiber posts have good effects and high value in oral restoration treatment.
Oral restorationPrefabricated fiber postPeriodontal healthInflammatory factorsPlastic fiber postRestoration time
万方数据
维普
