首页|伊伐布雷定治疗快速性心律失常的效果分析

伊伐布雷定治疗快速性心律失常的效果分析

扫码查看
目的 探讨伊伐布雷定治疗快速性心律失常的临床疗效,为心律失常患者的治疗提供新的思路。方法 选择 90 例快速性心律失常患者作为本次研究对象,根据治疗方法的不同分为对照组(n=45,给予琥珀酸美托洛尔治疗)和实验组(n=45,给予琥珀酸美托洛尔联合伊伐布雷定治疗)。比较两组患者的治疗效果、心率变异性指标[相邻NN间期>50 ms数量占总窦性心搏数量的百分数(PNN50)、连续正常R-R间期差值的均方根(RMSSD)、每 5 分钟NN间期平均值的标准差(SDANN)、NN间期标准差(SDNN)]和心律失常指标。结果 治疗后,实验组治疗总有效率 97。78%高于对照组的 77。78%,组间差异显著(P<0。05)。治疗前,两组患者PNN50、RMSSD、SDANN、SDNN相近,组间无显著差异(P>0。05);治疗后,实验组PNN50、RMSSD、SDANN、SDNN分别为(10。49±3。17)%、(28。80±5。16)ms、(116。18±32。81)ms、(122。63±28。40)ms,对照组分别为(8。81±3。36)%、(26。35±4。41)ms、(99。13±25。76)ms、(108。27±20。29)ms。治疗后,两组患者PNN50、RMSSD、SDANN、SDNN均有显著改善,且实验组改善幅度大于对照组,差异显著(P<0。05)。治疗后,实验组患者矩阵室性心动过速发作次数(1621。25±265。55)次低于对照组的(2635。75±378。35)次,组间差异显著(t=14。723,P=0。000<0。05);实验组心律失常恢复正常所需时间(14。48±2。68)d短于对照组的(18。37±2。87)d,组间差异显著(t=6。645,P=0。000<0。05)。结论 伊伐布雷定治疗快速性心律失常的疗效显著,可有效改善患者心率变异指标和心律失常指标,提高临床治疗效果,具有临床推广应用价值。
Analysis of the effect of ivabradine in the treatment of tachyarrhythmia
Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of ivabradine in the treatment of tachyarrhythmia,so as to provide new ideas for the treatment effect of arrhythmia patients.Methods 90 patients with tachyarrhythmia were selected for the study,and they were divided into a control group(n=45,treated with metoprolol succinate)and an experimental group(n=45,treated with metoprolol succinate combined with ivabradine)according to different treatment methods.Comparison was made on treatment efficacy,heart rate variability indicators[adjacent NN interval difference 50 ms percentage(PNN50),root mean square of the successive normal sinus R-R interval difference(RMSSD),standard diviation average of NN intervals(SDANN),standard diviation of NN intervals(SDNN)],and arrhythmia indicators between the two groups.Results After treatment,the total effective rate of the experimental group was 97.78%,which was higher than 77.78%of the control group,and the difference between groups was significant(P<0.05).Before treatment,PNN50,RMSSD,SDANN and SDNN were similar between the two groups,and there was no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05).After treatment,PNN50,RMSSD,SDANN and SDNN in the experimental group were(10.49±3.17)%,(28.80±5.16)ms,(116.18±32.81)ms and(122.63±28.40)ms,and those in the control group were(8.81±3.36)%,(26.35±4.41)ms,(99.13±25.76)ms and(108.27±20.29)ms.After treatment,PNN50,RMSSD,SDANN and SDNN were significantly improved in both groups,and the improvement amplitude of the experimental group was greater than that of the control group,the difference was significant(P<0.05).After treatment,the number of ventricular tachycardia episodes in the experimental group was(1621.25±265.55)times,which was lower than(2635.75±378.35)times in the control group,and the difference between groups was significant(t=14.723,P=0.000<0.05).The time required for arrhythmia recovery in the experimental group was(14.48±2.68)d,which was shorter than(18.37±2.87)d in the control group,and the difference between groups was significant(t=6.645,P=0.000<0.05).Conclusion Ivabradine has a significant therapeutic effect on tachyarrhythmia,which can effectively improve heart rate variability and arrhythmia indicators in patients,improve clinical treatment effectiveness,and have clinical promotion and application value.

IvabradineTachyarrhythmiaHeart rate variability

罗超

展开 >

114000 鞍钢集团公司总医院心内科

伊伐布雷定 快速性心律失常 心率变异

2024

中国现代药物应用
中国水利电力医学科学技术学会

中国现代药物应用

影响因子:0.862
ISSN:1673-9523
年,卷(期):2024.18(11)