Comparison of efficacy of octreotide and pituitrin in emergency treatment of acute gastrointestinal bleeding
Objective To analyze the efficacy of octreotide and pituitrin in emergency treatment of acute gastrointestinal bleeding.Methods 60 emergency room patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding were selected and divided into an observation group(30 cases,octreotide treatment)and a control group(30 cases,pituitrin treatment)according to the differences in treatment methods.The hemostatic effect,hemostatic time,length of hospital stay,average blood loss and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.Results The total effective rate of hemostasis in the observation group was 96.67%,which was higher than 80.00%in the control group(P<0.05).In the observation group,the hemostasis time was(1.86±0.44)d,the length of hospital stay was(4.85±0.67)d and the average blood loss was(68.23±7.26)ml,which were better than(2.75±0.62)d,(8.92±0.96)d and(112.44±9.41)ml in the control group(P<0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions was 3.33%in the observation group,which was significantly lower than 20.00%in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion The curative effect of octreotide in the emergency treatment of acute gastrointestinal bleeding is better than that of pituitrin,which is more capable of guaranteeing the efficacy of acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage and at the same time reducing the adverse drug reactions.
NETL
NSTL
万方数据
