首页|全面康复干预对急诊留观急性心衰患者生命体征指标和满意度的影响

全面康复干预对急诊留观急性心衰患者生命体征指标和满意度的影响

扫码查看
目的 探究急诊留观急性心力衰竭(心衰)患者给予全面康复干预的有效性,并分析其对患者生命体征指标和满意度的影响。方法 60 例急诊留观的急性心衰患者,根据电脑随机法分成两组,一组为常规组(n=30,给予常规干预模式),另一组为康复组(n=32,给予全面康复干预模式)。比较两组满意度及干预前后心理状态、应激状态、炎性细胞因子水平、心功能。结果 与同组干预前比较,两组干预后抑郁、焦虑、压力评分均降低(P<0。05);与常规组[(2。50±0。36)、(2。23±0。27)、(2。70±0。24)分]比较,康复组干预后抑郁、焦虑、压力评分[(1。82±0。32)、(1。76±0。20)、(2。18±0。19)分]均更低(P<0。05)。与同组干预前比较,两组干预后分离症状、创伤事件再体验、对创伤事件的回避、焦虑或醒觉性增高、社会功能损害评分均降低(P<0。05);与常规组比较,康复组干预后分离症状、创伤事件再体验、对创伤事件的回避、焦虑或醒觉性增高、社会功能损害评分均更低(P<0。05)。与同组干预前比较,两组干预后血清超敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、白细胞介素(IL)-1β、IL-6 水平均降低(P<0。05);与常规组比较,康复组干预后血清hs-CRP、IL-1β、IL-6 水平均更低(P<0。05)。与同组干预前比较,两组干预后心排血量、心脏指数、外周血管阻力均改善(P<0。05);与常规组比较,康复组干预后心排血量、心脏指数、外周血管阻力均更优(P<0。05)。与常规组(70。00%)比较,康复组干预后总满意度(90。63%)更高(P<0。05)。结论 全面康复干预能够改善急诊留观急性心衰患者生命体征指标,提高其满意度,值得推广与应用。
Effect of comprehensive rehabilitation intervention on vital signs and satisfaction of acute heart failure patients kept observation in emergency department
Objective To explore the effectiveness of comprehensive rehabilitation intervention for acute heart failure patients kept observation in emergency department,and analyze its influence on vital signs and satisfaction of patients.Methods 60 cases of acute heart failure patients kept in the emergency department were divided into two groups according to the computer random method,one group was the conventional group(n=30,conventional intervention mode),and the other group was the rehabilitation group(n=32,comprehensive rehabilitation intervention mode).The satisfaction,psychological state,stress state,inflammatory cytokine level and heart function before and after intervention were compared between the two groups.Results Compared with before intervention,the scores of depression,anxiety and stress in both groups were decreased after intervention(P<0.05).Compared with the conventional group[(2.50±0.36),(2.23±0.27)and(2.70±0.24)points],the scores of depression,anxiety and stress in the rehabilitation group[(1.82±0.32),(1.76±0.20)and(2.18±0.19)points]after intervention were all lower(P<0.05).Compared with before intervention,the scores of dissociative symptoms,re-experiencing of traumatic events,avoidance of traumatic events,increased anxiety or wakefulness,and social functioning impairment increased in both groups,and the social function impairment score decreased after intervention(P<0.05).Compared with the conventional group,the rehabilitation group had lower scores of dissociative symptoms,re-experiencing of traumatic events,avoidance of traumatic events,increased anxiety or wakefulness,and lower social impairment scores after intervention(P<0.05).Compared with before intervention,the serum levels of hypersensitive C-reactive protein(hs-CRP),interleukin(IL)-1β and IL-6 were decreased in both groups after intervention(P<0.05).Compared with the conventional group,the levels of serum hs-CRP,IL-1β and IL-6 in the rehabilitation group were lower after intervention(P<0.05).Compared with before intervention,the cardiac output,cardiac index and peripheral vascular resistance were improved in both groups after intervention(P<0.05).Compared with the conventional group,the cardiac output,cardiac index and peripheral vascular resistance were better in the rehabilitation group after intervention(P<0.05).Compared with the conventional group(70.00% ),the total satisfaction of the rehabilitation group(90.63% )was higher(P<0.05).Conclusion Comprehensive rehabilitation intervention can improve the vital signs of acute heart failure patients kept observation in emergency department and improve their satisfaction,which is worthy of promotion and application.

Comprehensive rehabilitation interventionEmergency department observationAcute heart failureVital sign indicatorsHeart functionSatisfaction

闫璐璐

展开 >

252300 阳谷县人民医院

全面康复干预 急诊留观 急性心力衰竭 生命体征指标 心功能 满意度

2024

中国现代药物应用
中国水利电力医学科学技术学会

中国现代药物应用

影响因子:0.862
ISSN:1673-9523
年,卷(期):2024.18(16)