首页|尿蛋白与尿微量白蛋白联用对糖尿病肾病患者的临床检验价值及阳性率探讨

尿蛋白与尿微量白蛋白联用对糖尿病肾病患者的临床检验价值及阳性率探讨

扫码查看
目的 分析尿蛋白与尿微量白蛋白联用对糖尿病肾病患者的临床检验价值及阳性率。方法 选取糖尿病肾病患者 60 例作为实验组,同时选择同期的单纯糖尿病患者 60 例作为对照组。两组患者均检测尿蛋白、尿微量白蛋白。对比两组患者尿蛋白、尿微量白蛋白的表达水平及阳性率。以临床诊断结果作为金标准,对比单一尿蛋白检测、单一尿微量白蛋白检测以及两者联合检测对糖尿病肾病的诊断灵敏度、特异度、准确度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值。结果 实验组尿蛋白水平(160。25±20。25)mg/L、阳性率 58。33%,尿微量白蛋白水平(35。92±9。26)mg/L、阳性率 63。33%均高于对照组的(131。25±17。33)mg/L、33。33%,(23。54±7。25)mg/L、30。00%(P<0。05)。单一检测尿蛋白的灵敏度、特异度、准确度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为 58。33%、66。67%、62。50%、63。64%、61。54%,单一检测尿微量白蛋白的灵敏度、特异度、准确度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为 63。33%、70。00%、66。67%、67。86%、65。63%,两者联合检测的灵敏度、特异度、准确度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为93。33%、86。67%、90。00%、87。50%、92。86%。尿蛋白、尿微量白蛋白联合检测的灵敏度、特异度、准确度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值均高于单一尿蛋白检测和单一尿微量白蛋白检测(P<0。05)。单一尿蛋白检测与单一尿微量白蛋白检测的灵敏度、特异度、准确度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值对比无明显差异(P>0。05)。结论 糖尿病肾病患者存在尿蛋白、尿微量白蛋白异常增高的情况,因此在糖尿病肾病的诊断中联合尿蛋白、尿微量白蛋白检测能够提高诊断的灵敏度、特异度和准确度,具有极高的应用价值。
Clinical test value and positive rate of urinary protein combined with urinary microalbumin in patients with diabetes nephropathy
Objective To analyze the clinical test value and positive rate of urinary protein combined with urinary microalbumin in patients with diabetes nephropathy.Methods 60 patients with diabetes nephropathy were selected as the experimental group,and 60 patients with simple diabetes admitted at the same time were selected as the control group.Both groups were tested for urinary protein and urinary microalbumin.The expression level and positive rate of urinary protein and urinary microalbumin were compared in the two groups.The clinical diagnosis results were taken as the gold standard to compare the diagnostic sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,positive predictive value,and negative predictive value for diabetic nephropathy by single urinary protein test,single urinary microalbumin test,and the combination of the two tests were compared.Results In the experimental group,the urinary protein level and positive rate were(160.25±20.25)mg/L and 58.33%,and the urinary microalbumin level and positive rate were(35.92±9.26)mg/L and 63.33%,which were higher than(131.25±17.33)mg/L,33.33%and(23.54±7.25)mg/L,30.00%in the control group(P<0.05).The sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,positive predictive value,and negative predictive value of the single urinary protein test were 58.33%,66.67%,62.50%,63.64%,and 61.54%,respectively;the sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,positive predictive value,and negative predictive value of the single urinary microalbumin test were 63.33%,70.00%,66.67%,67.86%,and 65.63%,respectively;the sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,positive predictive value,and negative predictive value of the two combined tests were 93.33%,86.67%,90.00%,87.50%,and 92.86%,respectively.The sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,positive predictive value,and negative predictive value of the combined tests of urinary protein and microalbumin were higher than those of the single urinary protein test and the single urinary microalbumin test(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,positive predictive value,and negative predictive value between the single urinary protein test and the single urinary microalbumin test(P>0.05).Conclusion There is an abnormal increase of urinary protein and microalbumin in patients with diabetes nephropathy.Therefore,the combination of urinary protein and microalbumin in the diagnosis of diabetes nephropathy can improve the sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of diagnosis,and has a very high application value.

Diabetes nephropathyUrinary proteinUrinary microalbuminJoint testingTest valuePositive rate

俞淼、张齐

展开 >

100026 北京市第一中西医结合医院

100020 北京市朝阳区垡头社区卫生服务中心

糖尿病肾病 尿蛋白 尿微量白蛋白 联合检测 检验价值 阳性率

2024

中国现代药物应用
中国水利电力医学科学技术学会

中国现代药物应用

影响因子:0.862
ISSN:1673-9523
年,卷(期):2024.18(19)