首页|手足十二针结合推拿对中风初期患者肢体功能的干预效果

手足十二针结合推拿对中风初期患者肢体功能的干预效果

扫码查看
目的 探讨手足十二针结合推拿对中风初期患者肢体功能的干预效果。方法 选取中风初期患者80例,依据干预方法不同分为结合干预组(给予手足十二针结合推拿干预)、常规康复组(给予常规康复干预),各40例。比较两组中医证候积分、神经功能[美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分]、日常生活活动能力[改良Barthel指数量表(MBI)评分]、平衡功能[Berg平衡量表(BBS)评分]、肢体功能[Fugl-Meyer运动功能评定量表(FMA)评分]、生活质量[健康调查简表(SF-36)评分]、步行能力、临床疗效。结果 干预后,两组患者的肢体麻木、半身不遂、神志昏蒙、言语骞涩、口舌歪斜积分均低于干预前,且结合干预组患者的肢体麻木、半身不遂、神志昏蒙、言语骞涩、口舌歪斜积分分别为(0。88±0。20)、(1。07±0。28)、(0。60±0。16)、(0。66±0。14)、(0。61±0。17)分,均低于常规康复组的(1。52±0。26)、(1。71±0。20)、(1。08±0。21)、(1。14±0。17)、(1。03±0。20)分(P<0。05)。干预后,两组患者的NIHSS评分低于干预前,MBI评分、BBS评分、上肢FMA评分、下肢FMA评分、FMA总分、SF-36评分均高于干预前,且结合干预组患者的NIHSS评分(7。40±1。58)分低于常规康复组的(9。96±2。03)分,MBI评分、BBS评分、上肢FMA评分、下肢FMA评分、FMA总分、SF-36评分分别为(63。46±5。12)、(44。14±4。28)、(46。97±4。70)、(29。35±4。04)、(76。32±9。41)、(82。42±9。35)分,均高于常规康复组的(51。95±5。43)、(39。86±4。01)、(35。46±3。88)、(22。27±3。77)、(57。73±9。45)、(70。23±9。56)分(P<0。05)。干预后,两组患者的步速、步长、步幅均大于干预前,步宽小于干预前,且结合干预组患者的步速、步长、步幅分别为(0。58±0。13)m/s、(39。13±5。78)cm、(76。83±9。03)cm,均大于常规康复组的(0。44±0。10)m/s、(34。57±5。97)cm、(67。20±8。45)cm,步宽(10。41±1。96)cm小于常规康复组的(11。35±2。00)cm(P<0。05)。结合干预组患者的总有效率95。00%(38/40)高于常规康复组的72。50%(29/40)(P<0。05)。结论 手足十二针结合推拿较常规康复对中风初期患者肢体功能的干预效果好。
Interventional effect of twelve needles for hands and feet combined with massage on limb function in early-stage stroke patients
Objective To explore the interventional effect of twelve needles for hands and feet combined with massage on limb function in early-stage stroke patients.Methods 80 patients with early-stage stroke were selected and divided into combined intervention group (twelve needles for hand and foot combined with massage intervention) and conventional rehabilitation group (conventional rehabilitation intervention) based on intervention methods,with 40 cases in each group.Both groups were compared in terms of traditional Chinese medicine syndrome score,neurological function[National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score],daily living activity ability[modified Barthel Index (MBI) score],balance function[Berg Balance Scale (BBS) score],limb function[Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) score],quality of life[36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) score],walking ability,and clinical efficacy.Results After intervention,the scores of limb numbness,hemiplegia,mental confusion,speech impediment,tongue and mouth deviation in both groups were lower than those before intervention;the scores of limb numbness,hemiplegia,mental confusion,speech impediment,tongue and mouth deviation were (0.88±0.20),(1.07±0.28),(0.60±0.16),(0.66±0.14) and (0.61±0.17) points in the combined intervention group,which were lower than (1.52±0.26),(1.71±0.20),(1.08±0.21),(1.14±0.17) and (1.03±0.20) points in the conventional rehabilitation group (P<0.05).After intervention,the NIHSS score in both groups was lower than that before intervention,and the MBI score,BBS score,FMA score of upper extremity,FMA score of lower extremity,total FMA score and SF-36 score were higher than those before intervention;the NIHSS score of (7.40±1.58) points in the combined intervention group was lower than (9.96±2.03) points in the conventional rehabilitation group;the MBI score,BBS score,FMA score of upper extremity,FMA score of lower extremity,total FMA score and SF-36 score were (63.46±5.12),(44.14±4.28),(46.97±4.70),(29.35±4.04),(76.32±9.41) and (82.42±9.35) points,which were higher than (51.95±5.43),(39.86±4.01),(35.46±3.88),(22.27±3.77),(57.73±9.45) and (70.23±9.56) points in the conventional rehabilitation group (P<0.05).After intervention,the step speed,step length and stride length in both groups were higher than those before intervention,and the step width was smaller than that before intervention;the stride speed,stride length and stride length were (0.58±0.13) m/s,(39.13±5.78) cm and (76.83±9.03) cm in the combined intervention group,which were higher than (0.44±0.10) m/s,(34.57±5.97) cm and (67.20±8.45) cm in the conventional rehabilitation group;the step width of (10.41±1.96) cm in the combined intervention group was smaller than (11.35±2.00) cm in the conventional rehabilitation group (P<0.05).The total effective rate of 95.00% (38/40) in combined intervention group was higher than 72.50% (29/40) in conventional rehabilitation group (P<0.05).Conclusion The combination of twelve needles for hands and feet and massage has a better intervention effect on limb function in early-stage stroke patients compared to conventional rehabilitation.

Early-stage strokeTwelve needles for hands and feetTuinaLimb functionQuality of lifeWalking ability

刘菊花

展开 >

341900 定南第二医院内一科

中风初期 手足十二针 推拿 肢体功能 生活质量 步行能力

2024

中国现代药物应用
中国水利电力医学科学技术学会

中国现代药物应用

影响因子:0.862
ISSN:1673-9523
年,卷(期):2024.18(21)