Comparison of the efficacy of gastric perforation repair using laparoscopic and open surgical procedures
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of gastric perforation repair using laparoscopic and open surgical procedures.Methods A total of 18 patients with gastric perforation were randomly divided into a study group(9 patients)and a control group(9 patients).The control group was treated with open repair of gastric perforation,and the study group was treated with laparoscopic repair of gastric perforation.The surgical indexes and complications were compared between the two groups.Results In the study group,the operation time was(1.03±0.44)h,the postoperative exhaust time was(12.00±0.55)h,and the hospitalization time was(7.21±1.46)d,which were shorter than(1.70±0.59)h,(15.12±0.64)h,and(10.42±1.55)d in the control group;the amount of bleeding of(14.55±6.93)ml in the study group was less than(23.50±6.99)ml in the control group;the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The study group had 1 case of incision infection,while the control group had 3 cases of incision infection and 2 cases of gastric bleeding;the occurrence of complications of 11.11%in the study group was lower than 55.56%in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The effect of laparoscopic repair for patients with gastric perforation is significantly better than that of open surgery,and it can become the preferred choice for clinical treatment of gastric perforation,which is of great significance for the development of the treatment of gastric perforation.
NETL
NSTL
万方数据
