血清CEA、AFP、CA125联合检测对卵巢肿瘤的鉴别诊断价值探讨

扫码查看

原文链接

NETL
NSTL
万方数据

中文摘要：目的观察血清癌胚抗原(CEA)、甲胎蛋白(AFP)、糖类抗原 125(CA125)联合检测对卵巢肿瘤的诊断价值。方法选取 60 例良性卵巢肿瘤患者作为良性组，同期 60 例恶性卵巢肿瘤患者作为恶性组，60 例健康体检者作为健康组。检测三组血清CA125、AFP、CEA 水平。比较三组血清CEA、AFP、CA125 水平，并以病理诊断作为金标准，分析以上指标联合检测对卵巢肿瘤良恶性的鉴别诊断效能。结果恶性组患者CEA(20。49±3。43)ng/ml、AFP(98。36±17。52)ng/ml、CA125(27。26±3。41)U/ml高于良性组的(5。58±0。76)ng/ml、(2。77±0。42)ng/ml、(4。57±1。52)U/ml和健康组的(2。15±0。52)ng/ml、(0。94±0。15)ng/ml、(2。73±0。55)U/ml，且良性组高于健康组，差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。联合检测的敏感性为 98。33%，特异性为 96。67%，准确性为 97。50%，阳性预测值为 96。72%，阴性预测值为 98。31%;CEA单一检测的敏感性为 56。67%，特异性为 65。00%，准确性为 60。83%，阳性预测值为 61。82%，阴性预测值为 60。00%;AFP单一检测的敏感性为 51。67%，特异性为 70。00%，准确性为 60。83%，阳性预测值为 63。27%，阴性预测值为 59。15%;CA125 单一检测的敏感性为 55。00%，特异性为 73。33%，准确性为64。17%，阳性预测值为 67。35%，阴性预测值为 61。97%。联合检测的敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值均高于血清CEA、AFP、CA125 单一检测，差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。结论针对女性卵巢的健康检查，血清CEA、AFP、CA125 联合检测方式对于卵巢肿瘤的良恶性有着很高的鉴别诊断价值，可为临床医生制定治疗措施提供参考依据。

外文标题：Exploring the diagnostic value of combined detection of serum CEA,AFP and CA125 in ovarian tumor

外文摘要：Objective To observe the diagnostic value of combined detection of serum carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA),alpha fetoprotein(AFP),and carbohydrate antigen 125(CA125)in ovarian tumor.Methods 60 patients with benign ovarian tumors were selected as the benign group,60 patients with malignant ovarian tumors as the malignant group,and 60 healthy individuals as the healthy group.The serum levels of CA125,AFP and CEA among the three groups were detected.The differences in serum levels of CEA,AFP,and CA125 were compared among three groups,and the efficiency of the combined detection of the above indexes in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian tumors was analyzed with pathological diagnosis as the gold standard.Results The tumor group had CEA of(20.49±3.43)ng/ml,AFP of(98.36±17.52)ng/ml and CA125 of(27.26±3.41)U/ml,which were higher than(5.58±0.76)ng/ml,(2.77±0.42)ng/ml and(4.57±1.52)U/ml in the benign group,and(2.15±0.52)ng/ml,(0.94±0.15)ng/ml and(2.73±0.55)U/ml in the healthy group;the benign group was higher than the healthy group;the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The sensitivity of the combined detection was 98.33%,the specificity was 96.67%,the accuracy was 97.50%,the positive predictive value was 96.72%,and the negative predictive value was 98.31%;the sensitivity of CEA single detection was 56.67%,the specificity was 65.00%,the accuracy was 60.83%,the positive predictive value was 61.82%,and the negative predictive value was 60.00%;the sensitivity of AFP single detection was 51.67%,the specificity was 70.00%,the accuracy was 60.83%,the positive predictive value was 63.27%,and the negative predictive value was 59.15%;the sensitivity of CA125 single detection was 55.00%,the specificity was 73.33%,the accuracy was 64.17%,the positive predictive value was 67.35%,and the negative predictive value was 61.97%.The sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,positive predictive value,and negative predictive value of combined detection were all higher than those of single detection of CEA,AFP and CA125,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion For female ovarian health examinations,the combined detection of serum CEA,AFP,and CA125 has high diagnostic value for the benign and malignant ovarian tumors,and can provide reference for clinical doctors to formulate treatment measures.

外文关键词：

Serum carcinoembryonic antigenAlpha fetoproteinCarbohydrate antigen 125Combined detectionOvarian tumorDiagnostic value

作者：

黄沉、沈舜钦

展开 >

作者单位：

363000 漳州正兴医院

关键词：

血清癌胚抗原甲胎蛋白糖类抗原125 联合检测卵巢肿瘤诊断价值

出版年：

2024

DOI：