首页|中药熏洗联合针刀治疗跟痛症患者的效果观察

中药熏洗联合针刀治疗跟痛症患者的效果观察

扫码查看
目的 观察中药熏洗联合针刀治疗跟痛症患者的效果。方法 54例跟痛症患者,通过红蓝摸球法按照1∶1的比例随机分为对照组和观察组。对照组应用针刀治疗,观察组在对照组基础上加用中药熏洗治疗。比较两组临床疗效,治疗前后的中医证候积分、踝与后足功能、足底各区[足弓(MF)、足前掌内侧缘(MFF)、足前掌外侧缘(LFF)、足跟内侧缘(MHEEL)、足跟外侧缘(LHEEL)]压力。结果 观察组(96。30%)较对照组(66。67%)的临床总有效率更高(P<0。05)。治疗21 d后,两组疼痛、压痛、功能障碍、失眠积分均较本组治疗前降低明显,且观察组疼痛积分(1。55±0。48)分、压痛积分(1。63±0。50)分、功能障碍积分(1。36±0。37)分、失眠积分(1。19±0。32)分较对照组的(2。79±0。84)、(2。92±0。87)、(2。42±0。71)、(2。06±0。63)分更低(P<0。05)。治疗21 d后,两组美国足踝外科医师协会量表(AOFAS)各项评分较本组治疗前升高明显,且观察组较对照组更高(P<0。05)。治疗21 d后,两组MF、MHEEL、LHEEL压力均较本组治疗前提升明显,且观察组MF压力(135。67±8。39)N/cm2、MHEEL压力(145。36±6。04)N/cm2、LHEEL压力(133。63±5。66)N/cm2较对照组的(128。54±7。25)、(138。52±5。93)、(127。58±4。81)N/cm2更高;MFF、LFF压力均较本组治疗前降低明显,且观察组MFF压力(126。34±2。03)N/cm2、LFF压力(120。33±5。84)N/cm2较对照组的(128。51±2。09)、(125。63±6。12)N/cm2更低(P<0。05)。结论 应用中药熏洗联合针刀治疗跟痛症患者效果显著,能够明显改善患者中医证候、踝与后足功能、足底各区压力。
Observation on the effect of chinese herbal fumigation and wash combined with acupotomy in the treatment of patients with heel pain
Objective To observe the effectiveness of Chinese herbal fumigation and wash combined with acupotomy in the treatment of patients with heel pain. Methods Fifty-four patients with heel pain were randomly divided into a control group and an observation group in a 1∶1 ratio using the red and blue ball drawing method. The control group received acupotomy treatment,while the observation group received additional Chinese herbal fumigation and wash treatment on the basis of the control group's treatment. Comparison was made on clinical efficacy,traditional Chinese medicine syndrome score,ankle and hindfoot function,and the pressure in various plantar regions[mid-foot (MF),medial forefoot (MFF),lateral forefoot (LFF),medial heel (MHEEL),lateral heel (LHEEL)]before and after treatment between the two groups. Results The clinical total effective rate was higher in the observation group (96.30%) compared to the control group (66.67%) (P<0.05). After 21 d of treatment,the scores of pain,tenderness,dysfunction and insomnia in both groups were significantly lower than those before treatment;in the observation group,the pain score was (1.55±0.48) points,the tenderness score was (1.63±0.50) points,the dysfunction score was (1.36±0.37) points,and the insomnia score was (1.19±0.32) points,which were lower than (2.79±0.84),(2.92±0.87),(2.42±0.71),and (2.06±0.63) points in the control group (P<0.05). After 21 d of treatment,the scores of the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) in both groups were significantly higher than those before treatment,and the observation group was higher than the control group (P<0.05). After 21 d of treatment,the pressure of MF,MHEEL and LHEEL in both groups were elevated significantly compared with those before treatment in this group;in the observation group,MF pressure was (135.67±8.39) N/cm2,MHEEL pressure was (145.36±6.04) N/cm2,and LHEEL pressure was (133.63±5.66) N/cm2,which were higher than (128.54±7.25),(138.52±5.93),and (127.58±4.81) N/cm2 in the control group;the pressures of MFF and LFF were decreased significantly compared with those before treatment in this group,and the observation group had MFF pressure of (126.34±2.03) N/cm2 and LFF pressure of (120.33±5.84) N/cm2,which were lower than (128.51±2.09) and (125.63±6.12) N/cm2 in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion The combined treatment of Chinese herbal fumigation and wash with acupotomy for patients with heel pain demonstrates remarkable efficacy,significantly improving the patients' Traditional Chinese Medicine syndromes,ankle and hindfoot function,as well as pressure distribution in various regions of the plantar area.

Traditional Chinese medicine fumigationAcupotomyCalcaneodyniaPlantar pressure

张群平

展开 >

350700 福建省永泰县中医院骨伤科

中药熏洗 针刀 跟痛症 足底压力

2024

中国现代药物应用
中国水利电力医学科学技术学会

中国现代药物应用

影响因子:0.862
ISSN:1673-9523
年,卷(期):2024.18(23)