首页|不同呼吸机辅助通气治疗ICU慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期合并呼吸衰竭的效果分析

不同呼吸机辅助通气治疗ICU慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期合并呼吸衰竭的效果分析

扫码查看
目的 探讨重症加强护理病房(ICU)慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期(AECOPD)合并呼吸衰竭(RF)患者采取不同呼吸机辅助通气治疗的效果。方法 选取ICU收治的56例AECOPD合并RF患者,根据呼吸机辅助通气治疗模式不同分为对照组与观察组,各28例。对照组予以有创呼吸机辅助通气治疗,观察组采用有创-无创序贯机械通气治疗。比较两组患者疗效、心率、呼吸频率、血气分析指标[动脉血氧饱和度(SaO2)、动脉血氧分压(PaO2)、动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)]、生活质量。结果 观察组总有效率92。86%高于对照组的67。86%,差异显著(P<0。05)。治疗后,观察组心率(85。32±6。28)次/min、呼吸频率(19。35±3。25)次/min、PaCO2(42。36±5。05)mm Hg(1 mm Hg=0。133 kPa)低于对照组的(93。02±6。81)次/min、(25。61±3。51)次/min、(46。65±6。42)mm Hg,PaO2(93。52±3。84)mm Hg、SaO2(82。51±5。86)%高于对照组的(89。25±4。11)mm Hg、(76。35±6。24)%,差异显著(P<0。05)。治疗后,观察组生理评分(64。42±3。57)分、心理评分(63。78±3。55)分、社会关系评分(66。33±4。37)分、环境评分(69。54±4。55)分高于对照组的(60。84±4。76)、(60。83±4。78)、(62。47±5。45)、(64。24±5。36)分,差异显著(P<0。05)。结论 对ICU收治的AECOPD合并RF患者采取有创-无创序贯机械通气治疗,与单纯有创机械通气比较,可更好地改善心率、呼吸频率及血气分析指标,从而提高临床效果,促使患者生活质量进一步提升,值得应用。
Effect analysis of different modes of ventilator-assisted ventilation in ICU patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and respiratory failure
Objective To explore the effect of different modes of ventilator-assisted ventilation in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) and respiratory failure (RF). Methods 56 patients with AECOPD and RF in ICU were selected and divided into a control group and an observation group according to different modes of ventilator-assisted ventilation,each consisting of 28 cases. The control group was treated with invasive ventilator-assisted ventilation,and the observation group was treated with sequential invasive-noninvasive mechanical ventilation. Patients in both groups were compared in terms of efficacy,heart rate,respiratory rate,blood gas analysis indexes[blood oxygen saturation (SaO2),arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2),arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2)]and quality of life. Results The total effective rate of 92.86% in the observation group was higher than 67.86% in the control group,and the difference was significant (P<0.05). After treatment,the observation group had heart rate of (85.32±6.28) beats/min,respiratory rate of (19.35±3.25) times/min,and PaCO2 (42.36±5.05) mm Hg (1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa),which were lower than (93.02±6.81) beats/min,(25.61±3.51) times/min,and (46.65±6.42) mm Hg in the control group;the observation group had PaO2 of (93.52±3.84) mm Hg and SaO2 of (82.51±5.86)%,which were higher than (89.25±4.11) mm Hg and (76.35±6.24)% in the control group;the difference was significant (P<0.05). After treatment,the physical score of the observation group was (64.42±3.57) points,the psychological score was (63.78±3.55) points,the social score was (66.33±4.37) points and the environmental score was (69.54±4.55) points,which were higher than (60.84±4.76),(60.83±4.78),(62.47±5.45) and (64.24±5.36) points of the control group,and the difference was significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with invasive mechanical ventilation alone,sequential invasive-noninvasive mechanical ventilation therapy for ICU patients with AECOPD and RF can better improve the heart rate,respiratory rate and blood gas analysis indicators,thereby improving the clinical effect and further improving the quality of life of patients,which is worthy of application.

Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseRespiratory failureInvasive mechanical ventilationNon invasive mechanical ventilationBlood gas analysis indicatorsQuality of life

阮班富、周根、丁江

展开 >

332400 江西省修水县中医院重症医学科

慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期 呼吸衰竭 有创机械通气 无创机械通气 血气分析指标 生活质量

2024

中国现代药物应用
中国水利电力医学科学技术学会

中国现代药物应用

影响因子:0.862
ISSN:1673-9523
年,卷(期):2024.18(23)