首页|阿伐斯汀和左西替利嗪治疗特应性皮炎的有效性和安全性对比

阿伐斯汀和左西替利嗪治疗特应性皮炎的有效性和安全性对比

扫码查看
目的 对特应性皮炎患者使用阿伐斯汀和左西替利嗪进行治疗的效果做出对比。方法 选取62例特应性皮炎患者,采用随机抽样法分为常规组和研究组,各31例。常规组使用阿伐斯汀进行治疗,研究组使用左西替利嗪进行治疗。比较两组患者治疗效果、皮损情况、炎性指标、瘙痒程度、不良反应发生情况、复发情况。结果 与常规组的74。19% 比较,研究组治疗总有效率96。77%更高,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。治疗后,研究组患者皮损严重情况评分(22。01±4。66)分、病变体积评分(4。21±1。34)分、睡眠状况和瘙痒情况评分(5。44±1。61)分、总分(31。66±6。41)分均低于常规组的(26。84±5。23)、(6。55±1。65)、(7。12±2。24)、(40。51±7。55)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。研究组患者白介素-4(10。85±2。61)ng/L、白介素-13(26。26±7。01)ng/L、白介素-17(24。15±6。65)ng/L、干扰素γ(IFN-γ)(15。88±2。23)ng/L均优于常规组的(13。57±3。94)、(30。36±6。58)、(28。86±7。46)、(13。86±2。44)ng/L,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。研究组患者治疗后1、2、4周的瘙痒程度评分分别为(5。05±1。46)、(2。03±0。85)、(1。24±1。06)分,均低于常规组的(6。42±1。73)、(4。64±1。75)、(3。12±1。34)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。研究组不良反应发生率6。45%略均低于常规组的12。90%,但差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。研究组复发率6。45%低于常规组的32。26%,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。结论 对特应性皮炎患者使用左西替利嗪治疗,可以减轻患者皮损程度,降低患者炎性指标水平,患者瘙痒程度得到显著缓解,治疗有效性和安全性均较高,存在临床推广意义。
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of acrivastine and levocetirizine in the treatment of atopic dermatitis
Objective To analyze the effect of acrivastine and levocetirizine in the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Methods A total of 62 patients with atopic dermatitis were randomly divided into a conventional group and a study group,with 31 cases in each group. The conventional group was treated with acrivastine,and the study group was treated with levocetirizine. The therapeutic effect,skin lesions,inflammatory indicators,pruritus severity,occurrence of adverse reactions and recurrence were compared between the two groups. Results Compared with 74.19% in the conventional group,the total effective rate of 96.77% in the study group was higher,and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). After treatment,the lesion severity score of the study group was (22.01±4.66) points,the lesion volume was (4.21±1.34) points,the sleep and pruritus score was (5.44±1.61) points and the total score was (31.66±6.41) points,which were lower than (26.84±5.23),(6.55±1.65),(7.12±2.24) and (40.51±7.55) points of the conventional group,and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The study group had interleukin-4 of (10.85±2.61) ng/L,interleukin-13 of (26.26±7.01) ng/L,interleukin-17 of (24.15±6.65) ng/L,and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) of (15.88±2.23) ng/L,which were better than (13.57±3.94),(30.36±6.58),(28.86±7.46),and (13.86±2.44) ng/L in the conventional group,and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The pruritus scores of the study group were (5.05±1.46),(2.03±0.85),and (1.24±1.06) points at 1,2,and 4 weeks after treatment,which were lower than (6.42±1.73),(4.64±1.75),and (3.12±1.34) points of the conventional group,and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The incidence rate of adverse reactions in the study group was 6.45%,which was slightly lower than 12.90% in the conventional group,but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The recurrence rate of 6.45% in the study group was lower than 32.26% in the conventional group,and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion For patients with atopic dermatitis,levocetirizine can reduce the lesion severity,reduce the levels of inflammatory indicators of patients,and significantly relieve the pruritus severity of patients,and the treatment is effective and safe,which has clinical promotion significance.

AcrivastineLevocetirizineAtopic dermatitisEfficacySafety

宋益兴

展开 >

255095 淄博市妇幼保健院(淄博市第三人民医院、淄博市妇女儿童医院)皮肤科

阿伐斯汀 左西替利嗪 特应性皮炎 疗效 安全性

2024

中国现代药物应用
中国水利电力医学科学技术学会

中国现代药物应用

影响因子:0.862
ISSN:1673-9523
年,卷(期):2024.18(23)