首页|桑白皮汤加减治疗慢阻肺急性加重期痰热壅肺型患者的临床效果观察

桑白皮汤加减治疗慢阻肺急性加重期痰热壅肺型患者的临床效果观察

扫码查看
目的 分析慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期(AECOPD)痰热壅肺型患者给予桑白皮汤加减治疗的效果。方法 160例AECOPD痰热雍肺型患者随机分为观察组和对照组,每组80例。对照组患者采取祛痰、平喘、抗感染等常规治疗,观察组患者在对照组治疗基础上加用桑白皮汤加减治疗。对比两组患者中医证候积分、肺功能指标、动脉血气指标、气道炎症指标、不良反应发生情况。结果 治疗后,观察组患者喘息积分(0。89±0。18)分、胸闷积分(0。94±0。16)分、咳黄痰积分(0。67±0。14)分、喉中痰鸣评分(0。73±0。15)分均低于对照组的(1。61±0。25)、(1。61±0。27)、(1。32±0。24)、(1。27±0。22)分(P<0。05)。治疗后,观察组患者肺动态顺应性(Cdyn)(24。39±2。55)L/kPa、呼气峰值流速(PEF)(3。52±0。58)L/s、用力肺活量(FVC)(2。87±0。63)L、第1秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)(2。28±0。43)L均高于对照组的(15。75±1。81)L/kPa、(2。66±0。50)L/s、(2。40±0。73)L、(1。67±0。46)L(P<0。05)。治疗后,观察组患者动脉血氧分压(PaO2)(84。11±5。64)mm Hg(1 mm Hg=0。133 kPa)、动脉血氧饱和度(SaO2)(93。04±2。24)%高于对照组的(72。03±4。29)mm Hg、(89。36±1。83)%,动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)(38。41±2。84)mm Hg低于对照组的(44。34±3。28)mm Hg(P<0。05)。治疗后,白细胞介素(IL)-17A(12。64±4。29)pg/ml、IL-1β(2。03±0。52)pg/ml、肿瘤坏死因子样细胞弱凋亡因子(TWEAK)(0。51±0。06)pg/ml、降钙素原(PCT)(0。30±0。03)μg/L均低于对照组的(24。08±5。01)pg/ml、(5。31±0。77)pg/ml、(0。63±0。10)pg/ml、(0。75±0。06)μg/L(P<0。05)。观察组不良反应发生率6。25%与对照组的7。50%差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。结论 桑白皮汤加减治疗对AECOPD痰热壅肺型患者治疗效果良好、安全性高,具有临床推广价值。
Observation on clinical effect of modified Sangbaipi Decoction in treating patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease of phlegm-heat obstructing lung type
Objective To evaluate the impact of the modified Sangbaipi Decoction on patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) of the phlegm-heat-obstructing-lung type. Methods 160 patients with AECOPD of the phlegm-heat-obstructing-lung type were randomly assigned to an observation group and a control group,with 80 cases in each group. The control group was treated with conventional symptomatic treatment such as expectorant,relieving asthma and anti-infection,and the observation group was treated with modified Sangbaipi Decoction on the basis of the control group. The traditional Chinese medicine syndrome score,lung function index,arterial blood gas index,airway inflammation index and adverse reaction occurrence were compared between the two groups. Results After treatment,the wheezing score of the observation group was (0.89±0.18) points,the chest tightness score was (0.94±0.16) points,the yellow phlegm coughing score was (0.67±0.14) points and the gurgling with sputum score was (0.73±0.15) points,which were lower than (1.61±0.25),(1.61±0.27),(1.32±0.24) and (1.27±0.22) points of the control group (P<0.05). After treatment,the observation group had dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn) of (24.39±2.55) L/kPa,peak expiratory flow rate (PEF) of (3.52±0.58) L/s,forced vital capacity (FVC) of (2.87±0.63) L,and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of (2.28±0.43) L,which were higher than (15.75±1.81) L/kPa,(2.66±0.50) L/s,(2.40±0.73) L,and (1.67±0.46) L in the control group (P<0.05). After treatment,in the observation group,the arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) was (84.11±5.64) mm Hg (1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa) and the arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) was (93.04±2.24)%,which were higher than (72.03±4.29) mm Hg and (89.36±1.83)% in the control group;the observation group had lower arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) of (38.41±2.84) mm Hg than (44.34±3.28) mm Hg in the control group (P<0.05). After treatment,the observation group had interleukin-17A of(12.64±4.29) pg/ml,IL-1β of (2.03±0.52) pg/ml,tumor necrosis factor like weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK) of (0.51±0.06) pg/ml,and procalcitonin (PCT) of (0.30±0.03) μg/L,which were lower than (24.08±5.01) pg/ml,(5.31±0.77) pg/ml,(0.63±0.10) pg/ml,and (0.75±0.06) μg/L in the control group(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the observation group (6.25%) and control group (7.50%) (P>0.05). Conclusion Modified Sangbaipi Decoction has a good therapeutic effect and high safety on patients with AECOPD of phlegm-heat obstructing lung type,and has clinical promotion value.

Modified Sangbaipi DecoctionAcute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseasePhlegm-heat obstructing lung typeClinical observation

万涛

展开 >

213200 江苏省常州市金坛区中医医院

桑白皮汤加减 慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期 痰热壅肺型 临床观察

2024

中国现代药物应用
中国水利电力医学科学技术学会

中国现代药物应用

影响因子:0.862
ISSN:1673-9523
年,卷(期):2024.18(23)