中国心理卫生杂志2013,Vol.27Issue(5) :378-383.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2013.05.012

中文大学生版Buss-Perry攻击性量表的修订与信效度分析

Development of the Chinese College Students' Version of Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire

吕路 高见和至 董冬 WONG Lawrence 王翕
中国心理卫生杂志2013,Vol.27Issue(5) :378-383.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2013.05.012

中文大学生版Buss-Perry攻击性量表的修订与信效度分析

Development of the Chinese College Students' Version of Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire

吕路 1高见和至 1董冬 2WONG Lawrence 3王翕4
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 日本神户大学人类发展环境学研究科,神户657-8501
  • 2. 日本神户大学人文学研究科,神户657-8501
  • 3. 日本神户大学系统情报学研究科,神户657-8501
  • 4. 澳大利亚莫纳什大学,维多利亚3800
  • 折叠

摘要

目的:引进Buss-Perry攻击性量表(BPAQ),并在大学生群体中进行修订,用来测量我国大学生的攻击性水平.方法:在不同行政区域的9所综合型大学抽取1722名在校大学生.对样本编号后,奇数组(n =864)被用于探索性因素分析以确认因子结构;偶数组(n=858)被用于对所得维度进行验证性因素分析.用大学生社会技能量表(ChUSSI)和羞涩量表(RCBS)为效标.抽取其中一所大学的165名学生于初评后2周进行重测.结果:通过探索性因素分析,得到由敌意、身体攻击、冲动、易怒性4个分量表(共22个项目)构成的中文大学生版Buss-Perry攻击性量表(CC-BPAQ);验证性因素分析显示数据拟合良好(GFI=0.917,AGFI=0.896,CFI=0.899,RMSEA=0.059);CC-BPAQ的敌意、身体攻击和易怒性分量表得分与ChUSSI得分呈负相关(r=-0.23、-0.19、-0.20,均P<0.01),CC-BPAQ的4个分量表得分均与RCBS得分呈正相关(r=0.45、0.21、0.11、0.32,均P<0.01).总量表的内部一致性Cronbach α系数为0.89,4个分量表的α系数为0.73 ~0.85;总量表的重测信度为0.91,4个分量表的重测信度为0.75 ~0.80.结论:修订后的中文大学生版Buss-Perry攻击性量表具有良好的信度和效度,可以用于大学生的攻击性测量.

Abstract

Objective: To develop a new version of the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire (BPAQ) applying to Chinese college students.Methods: By cluster sampling method, 9 comprehensive universities in China were selected based on administrative division, and then 1722 College Students from these 9 universities were investigated by convenience sampling.Subsequently, the sample was divided into odd group (n =864) and even group (n =858)according to their number.The odd group was assessed by exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to ascertain the factor structure of questionnaire, while the even group was assessed by confirmative factor analysis (CFA) to test and verify the dimensions obtained before, respectively.The Chinese University-students Social Skill Inventory (ChUSSI)and Revised Cheek and Buss Shyness (RCBS) scale were used as criterions to test validity.Totally 165 students in one school were re-test 2 weeks later.Results: By means of EFA, 4 factors (22 items), namely "hostility", "physical aggression", "impulsivity and anger proneness", were extracted from BPAQ to develop a new model of the Chinese College Students'Version of Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire (CC-BPAQ).Confirmative factor analysis (CFA) was used to examine this new model (GFI =0.917, AGFI =0.896, CFI =0.899, RMSEA =0.059), which indicated a relatively high compatibility between the model and sample data.The scores of CC-BPAQ "hostility", "physical aggression", and "anger proneness" were negatively correlated with the ChUSSI scores (r =-0.23,-0.19,-0.20; Ps < 0.01), while positively correlated with the RCBS scrose (r =0.45, 0.21, 0.11, 0.32; Ps <0.01).The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the total scale was 0.89, and 4 subscales was 0.73-0.85.The testretest reliability coefficient was 0.91 for the total scale, 0.75-0.80 for the 4 subscales.Conclusion: It suggests that the Chinese College Students Version of Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire is reliable and valid, and could be used as a tool for measuring college students' aggression.

关键词

攻击性/大学生/探索性因素分析/验证性因素分析/心理测量学

Key words

aggression/college students/exploratory factor analysis/confirmative factor analysis/psychometric studies

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2013
中国心理卫生杂志
中国心理卫生协会

中国心理卫生杂志

CSTPCDCSCDCHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:2.088
ISSN:1000-6729
被引量48
参考文献量5
段落导航相关论文