首页|共同养育问卷测评中学生及父母的效度与信度

共同养育问卷测评中学生及父母的效度与信度

扫码查看
目的:修订共同养育问卷(青少年版和父母版)(CI-PA)中文版,并在中学生及其父母中检验其效度和信度。方法:选取中学生691名完成CI-PA青少年版,其父母924名同时完成CI-PA父母版。将样本随机分半,分别进行条目分析和探索性因子分析及验证性因子分析、效标关联效度分析、聚敛效度检验。以Achenbach青少年行为自评量表(YSR)、Olson婚姻质量问卷(ENRICH)的婚姻满意度分量表(MSS)为效标工具。间隔4周后,随机选取中学生62人及父母70人进行重测。结果:探索性因子分析表明,青少年版和父母版分别有37、25个条目,分问卷均抽取了 3个公因子,均包括合作、三角关系和冲突3个维度,各条目因子负荷为0。60~0。95,累积解释总方差64。56%~74。06%;验证性因子分析表明,青少年版分问卷(x2/df=1。32、1。30、1。41,CFI=0。99、0。99、0。99,TLI=0。99、0。99、0。98,RMSEA=0。03、0。03、0。03)和父母版分问卷(x2/df=1。20、1。33,CFI=0。99、0。99,TLI=0。99、0。99,RMSEA=0。02、0。03)模型均拟合良好。青少年版的合作维度得分与YSR攻击行为、焦虑/抑郁得分均负相关(ICC=-0。18~-0。27,均P<0。01),三角关系和冲突2个维度得分与YSR攻击行为、焦虑/抑郁得分均正相关(ICC=0。15~0。34,均P<0。01);父母版合作维度得分与MSS得分正相关(ICC=0。52、0。47,均P<0。01),三角关系和冲突2个维度得分与MSS得分负相关(ICC=-0。28~-0。47,均P<0。01)。青少年版和父母版分问卷各维度的Cronbach α系数均>0。72,重测信度(ICC)均>0。54。结论:共同养育问卷(青少年版和父母版)(CI-PA)中文版测评父母共同养育具有较好的效度和信度。
Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Coparenting Inventory for Parents and Adolescents in middle school students and parents
Objective:To revise the Chinese version of the Coparenting Inventory for Parents and Adolescents(CI-PA)in middle school students and their parents to test the validity and reliability.Methods:Totally 691 middle school students were tested with the adolescent version of CI-PA,924 parents were tested with the parents'version of CI-PA.The sample was split randomly in half,and item analysis and exploratory factor analysis,confirmatory factor analysis,criterion validity analysis and convergent validity test were performed respectively.The Achenbach Youth Self-Report(YSR)and marital satisfaction subscale(MSS)of Olson Enrich Marital Inventory(ENRICH)were used to test the validity of the criterion.Totally 62 students and 70 parents were followed to complete the Chi-nese version of CI-PA 4 weeks after the first investigation.Results:Exploratory factor analysis showed that there were 37 and 25 items in the adolescent version and the parents'version respectively,3 factors were extracted,inclu-ding 3 dimensions of cooperation,triangulation and conflict.The factor loadings of each item ranged from 0.60 to 0.95,and the subscales explained the total variance ranged from 64.56%to 74.06%.Confirmatory factor analysis showed that all the 3 factors models fitted well in adolescent version(x2/df=1.32,1.30,1.41;CFI=0.99,0.99,0.99;TLI=0.99,0.99,0.98;RMSEA=0.03,0.03,0.03)and the parents'version(x2/df=1.20,1.33;CFI=0.99,0.99;TLI=0.99,0.99;RMSEA=0.02,0.03).Cooperation scores of the adolescent version were negatively correlated with the YSR scores(ICC=-0.18--0.27,Ps<0.01),triangulation and conflict scores of the adoles-cent version were positively correlated with the YSR scores(ICC=0.15-0.34,Ps<0.01).Cooperation scores of the parents'version were positively correlated with the MSS scores(ICC=0.52,0.47,Ps<0.01),triangulation and conflict scores of the parents'version were negatively correlated with the MSS scores(ICC=-0.28--0.47,Ps<0.01).The Cronbach's α of 3 dimensions were all above 0.72,the retest reliabilities(ICC)were all a-bove 0.54.Conclusion:The Chinese version of Coparenting Inventory for Parents and Adolescents(CI-PA)is valid and reliable in measuring the coparenting in Chinese adolescence families.

coparentingadolescentvalidityreliability

王菁、刘爱书、迟梓远

展开 >

哈尔滨师范大学教育科学学院,哈尔滨 150025

艾伯哈特·卡尔斯·图宾根大学哲学系,德国 图宾根D-72047

共同养育 青少年 效度 信度

2024

中国心理卫生杂志
中国心理卫生协会

中国心理卫生杂志

CSTPCDCHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:2.088
ISSN:1000-6729
年,卷(期):2024.38(6)