首页|成人社交焦虑问卷中文版的效度和信度评价

成人社交焦虑问卷中文版的效度和信度评价

扫码查看
目的:检验成人社交焦虑问卷中文版(CSAQ-A)的效度和信度。方法:选取555名成人[年龄18~60岁,平均(29±8)岁]完成CSAQ-A。采用Liebowitz社交焦虑量表(LSAS)、简版惧怕否定评价量表(BFNE)、宾州忧虑问卷(PSWQ)、特质焦虑量表(STAI-T)、贝克抑郁量表第二版(BDI-Ⅱ)为效标工具。间隔4周后143名成人完成重测。结果:5因子结构的拟合指数良好(x2/df=3。06,CFI=0。92,TLI=0。91,RMSEA=0。06,SRMR=0。05);CSAQ-A 得分与 LSAS、BFNE、PSWQ、STAI-T、BDI-Ⅱ 得分均呈正相关(ICC=0。40~0。67,均P<0。001)。CSAQ-A 总量表的 Cronbach α 系数为0。96,重测信度为0。80。结论:成人社交焦虑问卷中文版评估成年人群社交焦虑症状的效度和信度良好。
Validity and reliability of the Chinese Social Anxiety Questionnaire for Adults
Objective:To test the validity and reliability of the Chinese Social Anxiety Questionnaire for A-dults(CSAQ-A).Methods:Totally 555 participants[aged 18 to 60 years,average age(29±8)years old]were recruited to complete the CSAQ-A.The Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale(LSAS),Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale(BFNE),Penn State Worry Questionnaire(PSWQ),State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait(STAI-T),and Beck Depression Scale-Second Edition(BDI-Ⅱ)were conducted to test the criterion validity.After 4 weeks,143 subjects were retested.Results:Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that the five-dimensional structure of the CSAQ-A exhibited excellent fit indices(x2/df=3.06,CFI=0.92,TLI=0.91,RMSEA=0.06,SRMR=0.05).The CSAQ-A scores were positively correlated with the scores of LSAS,BFNE,PSWQ,STAI-T and BDI-Ⅱ(ICC=0.40-0.67,Ps<0.001).The Cronbach α coefficient of the CSAQ-A scale was 0.96,and the test-retest reliability was 0.80.Conclusion:The Chinese Social Anxiety Questionnaire for Adults has good validity and reliability and could effectively evaluate social anxiety in the Chinese adult population.

social anxietyadultsvalidityreliabilitymeasurement invariance

王愉茜、臧寅垠、彭玉佳

展开 >

北京大学心理与认知科学学院,北京市行为与健康重点实验室,北京 100871

北京大学人工智能研究院,北京 100871

跨媒体通用人工智能全国重点实验室,北京通用人工智能研究院,北京 100080

社交焦虑 成人 效度 信度 测量等值性

国自然青年科学基金项目青年托举人才项目国自然青年科学基金项目国自然面上基金项目

322008542021QNRC003200077632371139

2024

中国心理卫生杂志
中国心理卫生协会

中国心理卫生杂志

CSTPCDCHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:2.088
ISSN:1000-6729
年,卷(期):2024.38(8)