奖惩敏感性问卷修订版测评进食障碍患者的效度和信度
Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire-Revised and Clarified(SPSRQ-RC)in patients with eating disorders
刘雪滢 1李雪霓 1耿淑霞 1杨磊 1陈超 1孔庆梅 1司天梅1
作者信息
- 1. 北京大学第六医院,北京大学精神卫生研究所,国家卫生健康委员会精神卫生学重点实验室(北京大学),国家精神心理疾病临床医学研究中心(北京大学第六医院),北京 100083
- 折叠
摘要
目的:评估中文版奖惩敏感性问卷修订版(SPSRQ-RC)在进食障碍患者中应用的效度和信度.方法:选择111例符合精神障碍诊断与统计手册第5版(DSM-5)进食障碍诊断标准的患者完成SPSRQ-RC中文版、Barratt冲动性量表-11(BIS-11)、特质焦虑量表(TAI)、进食障碍检查自评问卷中文版(EDE-Q 6.0)的测评.选取20例患者在2周内进行重测.结果:探索性因子分析得到3个因子,累计方差贡献率为55.65％.奖励敏感性与BIS-11的组内相关系数为0.26,惩罚敏感性与TAI的组内相关系数为0.25,SPSRQ-RC 中文版及EDE-Q 6.0的相关系数为0.35.问卷的Cronbach α系数及重测信度分别为0.83及0.82.结论:SPSRQ-RC中文版测评进食障碍患者显示有较好的心理测量学特性.
Abstract
Objective:To evaluate the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Sensitivity to Pun-ishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire-Revised and Clarified(SPSRQ-RC)in patients with eating disor-ders.Methods:Totally 111 patients with eating disorders meeting diagnostic criteria of DSM-5 were assessed with SPSRQ-RC,Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11(BIS-11),Trait Anxiety Inventory(TAI)and Eating Disorder Exami-nation Questionnaire 6.0(EDE-Q 6.0).Results:Three factors were extracted from the items by exploratory factor analysis with cumulative variance being 55.65％.The interclass correlation coefficient(ICC)of SR and BIS-11 was 0.26,the ICC of SP and TAI was 0.25,and the correlation coefficient of the SPSRQ-RC and EDE-Q 6.0 was 0.35.The Cronbach's α coefficient of the SPSRQ-RC was 0.83,the test-retest reliability of the scale was 0.82.Conclusion:The Chinese version of SPSRQ-RC shows good psychometric properties in patients with eating disor-ders.
关键词
进食障碍/奖惩敏感性问卷/强化敏感性理论/效度/信度Key words
eating disorder/sensitivity to punishment and sensitivity to reward questionnaire/reinforcement sensitivity theory/validity/reliability引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
国家科技期刊平台
NSTL
万方数据