首页|全面性教育课程改善大学生敌意和善意性别偏见的效果评估

全面性教育课程改善大学生敌意和善意性别偏见的效果评估

扫码查看
目的 探讨全面性教育课程对大学生敌意和善意性别偏见态度的影响,为评价全面性教育干预矛盾性别偏见的效果提供参考.方法 于2018年9月-2019年1月,采用方便抽样方法从北京市抽取1所高校共165名大学生,开展为期5个月(共36节课,每周2节,每节45 min)的全面性教育课程(包括全面性教育与性别研究、性生理与健康、社会性别和性别角色、性别偏见、亲密关系与性别偏见、性别暴力与性别偏见、文化与性别偏见和社会性别与权力),将选修全面性教育课程的学生纳入干预组(97名),同校且未参加过性教育课程的学生纳入对照组(68名).使用矛盾性别偏见量表对课程干预前后两组大学生进行调查,分析全面性教育课程的干预效果.采用x2检验、方差分析、聚类分析和Kruskal-Wallis检验进行统计学分析.结果 接受全面性教育课程后,干预组的敌意和善意性别偏见评分(2.21±0.76,2.36±0.68)均低于对照组(2.81±0.61,3.03±0.60)(F值分别为 17.24,33.26)和干预组前测评分(2.64±0.67,2.88±0.68)(F值分别为 45.62,66.93)(P值均<0.01).在敌意和善意性别偏见评分上,女生评分(2.46±0.72,2.65±0.70)均低于男生(2.86±0.59,3.09± 0.69)(F值分别为11.02,14.20,P值均<0.01).敌意和善意性别偏见不同聚类组别的干预效果比较显示,不一致型的敌意性别偏见评分差值0.63(0.25,1.25)高于一致较高型 0.38(-0.16,0.88)和一致较低型 0.38(0.06,0.63)(H=8.71,P<0.05);一致较高型的善意性别偏见评分差值0.75(0.53,1.22)高于一致较低型0.38(0.09,0.88)和不一致型0.38(-0.13,0.63)(H=10.82,P<0.05).结论 全面性教育能够改善大学生敌意和善意性别偏见,并具有性别和类型差异.应关注全面性教育课程,改善大学生矛盾性别偏见,以期培养大学生的性别平等意识.
Effectiveness of comprehensive sexuality education curriculum on improving hostile and benevolent sexism among universi-ty students
Objective To explore the effectiveness of a comprehensive sexuality education(CSE)curriculum on university students'hostile and benevolent sexism,so as to provide a reference for evaluating the effects of CSE on reducing ambivalent sexism.Methods From September 2018 to January 2019,165 university students from a university in Beijing were recruited using conven-ience sampling for a 5-month of CSE curriculum(36 sessions,2 sessions per week,45 min per session),including CSE and gender studies,sexual physiology and health,gender and gender roles,gender bias,intimate relationships and gender bias,gender-based violence and gender bias,culture and gender bias,and gender and power.Students who took CSE curriculum were included in the intervention group(n=97)and students from the same university who had not taken CSE curriculum were included in the control group(n=68).Using the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory,both groups of university students were surveyed before and after the cur-riculum to analyze the effectiveness of the CSE curriculum.Chi-square test,ANOVA,cluster analysis and Kruskal Wallis test were used for statistical analysis.Results After the CSE curriculum,both hostile and benevolent sexism scores were lower in the inter-vention group(2.21±0.76,2.36±0.68)than in the control group(2.81±0.61,3.03±0.60)(F=17.24,33.26),and pre-test scores were higher in the intervention group(2.64±0.67,2.88±0.68)(F=45.62,66.93)(P<0.01).On both hostile and benevolent sex-ism,female students'scores(2.46±0.72,2.65±0.70)were lower than male students'scores(2.86±0.59,3.09±0.69)(F=11.02,14.20,P<0.01).Comparison of the curriculum effectiveness of hostile and benevolent sexism among clustered groups showed that the difference in hostile sexism scores was higher in the inconsistent type[0.63(0.25,1.25)]than in the more consistent type[0.38(-0.16,0.88)]and the lower consistent type[0.38(0.06,0.63)](H=8.71,P<0.05);and the difference in benevolent sexism scores was higher in the more consistent type[0.75(0.53,1.22)]than in the less consistent type[0.38(0.09,0.88)]and inconsis-tent type[0.38(-0.13,0.63)](H=10.82,P<0.05).Conclusions CSE can improve hostile and benevolent sexism in university students with sex and type differences.Attention should be paid to CSE curriculum to improve ambivalent sexism among university students with a view to fostering their awareness of gender equality.

Sex educationSexismStudentsIntervention studies

芦鸣祺、郭凌风、刘文利

展开 >

北京师范大学中国基础教育质量监测协同创新中心,北京 100875

北京师范大学心理学部认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室

性教育 偏见 学生 干预性研究

联合国教科文组织项目联合国人口基金和联合国教科文组织项目

324028040UNFPA/CHN/2019/04

2024

中国学校卫生
中华预防医学会

中国学校卫生

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.423
ISSN:1000-9817
年,卷(期):2024.45(3)
  • 24