首页|北京市不吸烟初中生2013-2021年二手烟暴露及相关因素分析

北京市不吸烟初中生2013-2021年二手烟暴露及相关因素分析

扫码查看
目的 分析北京市不吸烟初中生二手烟暴露情况及相关因素,为制定烟草控制措施提供数据支持。方法 采用多阶段整群随机抽样方法,确定北京市初中在校生为调查对象,2013年9-10月、2019年8-11月和2021年9-12月3次青少年烟草流行监测分别获得4 494,4 915和3 792份不吸烟初中生的有效数据,使用全国青少年烟草流行监测调查问卷进行信息采集。采用SPSS 21。0软件的复杂抽样数据分析模块进行描述性分析和多因素Logistic回归分析。结果 2013,2019和2021年北京市不吸烟初中生在过去7 d内的4类场所(家、室内公共场所、室外公共场所、公共交通工具)二手烟暴露率分别为76。4%,71。4%,65。7%,差异有统计学意义(x2=126。10,P<0。01)。3次监测在学校看见有人吸烟的比例分别为34。7%,27。9%和 21。1%(x2=209。78);每天看见教师吸烟的比例分别为 2。7%,1。8%和1。3%(x2=22。14)(P值均<0。01)。多因素 Logistic 回归分析结果显示,父母均吸烟(OR=8。47,95%CI=4。36~16。48)、父亲吸烟(OR=3。51,95%CI=2。75~4。49)、好友吸烟(OR=1。88,95%CI=1。39~2。55)均是2013年不吸烟初中生4类场所二手烟暴露的相关因素;父母均吸烟(OR=2。37,95%CI=1。33~4。22)、父亲吸烟(OR=2。80,95%CI=2。33~3。37)、好友吸烟(OR=2。24,95%CI=1。71~2。92)、课堂上教授烟草危害(OR=0。77,95%CI=0。64~0。93)是2019年不吸烟初中生4类场所二手烟暴露的相关因素;父母均吸烟(OR=3。93,95%CI=2。29~6。75)、父亲吸烟(OR=3。30,95%CI=2。72~3。99)、课堂上教授烟草危害(OR=0。81,95%CI=0。68~0。97)是2021年不吸烟初中生4类场所二手烟暴露的相关因素(P值均<0。05)。结论 北京市不吸烟中学生二手烟暴露情况有所改善,但仍处于较高水平。应采取相应措施,切实保护不吸烟初中生免受二手烟危害。
Second-hand smoke exposure and related factors of non-smoking junior middle school students in Beijing from 2013 to 2021
Objective To analyze the second-hand smoke exposure and related factors of non-smoking junior middle school students in Beijing,so as to provide a data support for formulating tobacco control measures.Methods The multi-stage cluster ran-dom sampling method was used to select junior middle school students in Beijing.The valid data of 4 494,4 915 and 3 792 non-smoking middle school students were obtained from three waves of youth tobacco epidemic surveillance in 2013(September to Octo-ber),2019(August to November)and 2021(September to December)wave,respectively.The information was collected by the na-tional youth tobacco epidemic surveillance questionnaire.The complex sampling data analysis module of SPSS 21.0 was used to de-scriptive analysis and multivariate Logistic regression.Results The proportions of second-hand smoke exposure of non-smoking junior middle school students in the four types of places in the past 7 days in 2013,2019 and 2021 in Beijing were 76.4%,71.4%and 65.7%,respectively,with statistically significant differences(x2=126.10,P<0.01).The proportions of that found someone smoking in the campus in the three waves of survey were 34.7%,27.9%and 21.1%(x2=209.78),the proportion of that found teachers smoking daily were 2.7%,1.8%and 1.3%(x2=22.14)(P<0.01),respectively.Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed both parents smoking(OR=8.47,95%CI=4.36-16.48),father smoking(OR=3.51,95%CI=2.75-4.49),and friends smoking(OR=1.88,95%CI=1.39-2.55)were the influencing factors of second-hand smoke exposure in four types of places of non-smoking junior middle school students in 2013.Both parents smoking(OR=2.37,95%CI=1.33-4.22),father smoking(OR=2.80,95%CI=2.33-3.37),friends smoking(OR=2.24,95%CI=1.71-2.92),and teaching the tobacco hazards in class(OR=0.77,95%CI=0.64-0.93)were the influencing factors of second-hand smoke exposure in four types of places for non-smoking mid-dle school students in 2019.Both parents smoking(OR=3.93,95%CI=2.29-6.75),fathers smoking(OR=3.30,95%CI=2.72-3.99),and teaching the tobacco hazards in the class(OR=0.81,95%CI=0.68-0.97)were the influential factor of second-hand smoke exposure in four types of places of non-smoking junior middle school students in 2021(P<0.05).Conclusions The second-hand smoke exposure of non-smoking middle school students in Beijing has improved,but still is a high level.It is necessary to take corresponding measures to effectively protect non-smoking junior middle school students from the harm of second-hand smoke.

SmokingTobacco smoke pollutionRegression analysisStudents

石建辉、徐露婷、孟耀涵、韩梅、刘秀荣

展开 >

北京市疾病预防控制中心健康教育所,100020

吸烟 烟草烟污染 回归分析 学生

2024

中国学校卫生
中华预防医学会

中国学校卫生

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.423
ISSN:1000-9817
年,卷(期):2024.45(7)