首页|加速度计测评方法对学龄儿童久坐行为和身体活动测评结果的影响

加速度计测评方法对学龄儿童久坐行为和身体活动测评结果的影响

扫码查看
目的 探索加速度计不同配戴部位、采样间隔和切点对测评学龄儿童久坐行为(SB)、低强度身体活动(LPA)和中高强度身体活动(MVPA)的影响,为优化加速度计测评学龄儿童SB和身体活动的标准提供参考。方法 2021年5月至2022年9月,从杭州市某小学方便抽取110名8~12岁学龄儿童为研究对象,学龄儿童在校期间于髋部、背部、大腿、手腕4个部位配戴加速度计,采集数据转化为6种采样间隔数据集(1,5,10,15,30,60 s),比较Puyau、Freedson、Evenson、Pulsford 4种常见切点(共96种组合)SB、LPA和MVPA时间占比。使用三因素重复测量方差分析不同配戴部位、采样间隔和切点及其交互作用对测评结果的影响,使用Bonferroni事后检验分析组间多重比较的差异性。结果 除切点×配戴部位×采样间隔对SB占比的交互作用和采样间隔对MVPA占比的主效应均无统计学意义外(F值分别为0。66,1。18,P值均>0。05),3个因素对测评结果其余的主效应与交互作用均有统计学意义(F=6。28~11 662。28,P值均<0。01)。不同配戴部位结果差异均有统计学意义(F=90。98~308。79,P值均<0。01)。SB和MVPA占比随采样间隔的增加而下降,LPA占比则随着采样间隔增加而上升(F=16。54~676。35,P值均<0。01)。不同切点测评结果差异有统计学意义(F=98。14~976。40,P值均<0。01)。结论 配戴部位、采样间隔与切点的加速度计方法学因素会影响学龄儿童SB和PA的估计值。未来研究需要优化加速度计分析方法在学龄儿童的适用性,谨慎对待不同研究之间的结果。
Effect of accelerometer assessment methods on the evaluation results of sedentary behaviour and physical activity in school-aged children
Objective To explore the effects of different positions,epoch lengths and cut points of accelerometers on the meas-urement of sedentary behaviour(SB),light physical activity(LPA)and moderate-vigorous physical activity(MVP A)in school-aged children,so as to provide a reference for optimizing the criteria of accelerometers to measure SB and physical activity in school-aged children.Methods From May 2021 to September 2022,110 school-aged children aged 8-12 years old were conven-ient selected from a primary school in Hangzhou,and the accelerometers were worn on the waist,back,thigh,and wrist during the school time,and the collected data were transformed into six datasets with different epoch lengths(1,5,10,15,30,and 60 s)and compared using 4 common cut-points developed by Puyau,Freedson,Evenson,and Pulsford(a total of 96 combinations)for classifying the percentages of time spent in SB,LPA,and MVPA.The effects of different positions,epoch lengths and cut points and their interactions on the assessment results were analyzed using a three-way repeated measures ANOVA,and the variability of multiple comparisons between groups was analyzed using a Bonferroni post-hoc test.Results Except for the interaction of cut point x position x epoch on the percentage of time spent in SB and the main effect of epoch on he percentage of time spent in MVPA were not statistically significant(F=0.66,1.18,P>0.05),the remaining main effects and interactions of the three factors on the as-sessment results were all statistically significant(F=6.28-11 662.28,P<0.01).The differences between the results of different po-sitions were statistically significant(F=90.98-308.79,P<0.01).The percentages of time spent in SB and MVPA decreased with the increase of epoch lengths,while the percentage of time spent in LPA increased with the increase of epoch lengths(F=16.54-676.35,P<0.01).The difference between the results using different cut points measurements was statistically significant(F=98.14-976.40,P<0.01).Conclusions Accelerometer methodological factors including positions,epoch lengths and cut points will affect the estimates of SB and physical activity in school-aged children.Therefore,it is recommended that future studies need to optimize the applicability of accelerometer analysis methods in school-aged children,and the comparisons of results between studies need to be treated with caution.

Sedentary lifestyleMotor activityAnalysis of varianceChild

项诚、高莹、李青阳、赵晗华

展开 >

浙江大学教育学院,杭州 310058

久坐生活方式 运动活动 方差分析 儿童

2024

中国学校卫生
中华预防医学会

中国学校卫生

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.423
ISSN:1000-9817
年,卷(期):2024.45(12)