首页|不同手术入路治疗Siewert Ⅱ型食管胃结合部腺癌临床疗效的回顾性队列研究

不同手术入路治疗Siewert Ⅱ型食管胃结合部腺癌临床疗效的回顾性队列研究

扫码查看
目的 对比不同手术人路治疗SiewertⅡ型食管胃结合部腺癌的临床疗效.方法 回顾性分析2014年8月一2019年12月甘肃省人民医院胸外一科收治的行手术治疗Siewert Ⅱ型食管胃结合部腺癌患者的临床资料.根据手术入路方式的不同将患者分为两组:经腹膈肌食管裂孔入路患者为经腹组,胸腹联合右胸入路患者为胸腹联合组.比较两组患者近、远期疗效.结果 共纳入87例患者,经腹组48例,男31例、女17例,平均年龄(60.85±8.47)岁;胸腹联合组39例,男25例、女14例,平均年龄(61.13±8.51)岁.两组在性别、年龄、肿瘤大小和分期等基线指标方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).与胸腹联合组相比,经腹组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后卧床时间、术后总引流量更短或更少,术后第3 d疼痛视觉评分更低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).但是胸腹联合组术中清扫淋巴结总数、胸腔淋巴结清扫数目以及胸腔阳性淋巴结数目均高于经腹组,差异有统计学意义(P=0.001).胸腹联合组和经腹组中位生存时间分别为25.85个月和20.86个月,胸腹联合组的3年总生存率高于经腹组(46.2%vs.38.9%,x2=5.995,P=0.014).而两组在术后带管时间、食管及胃切缘距离、腹腔淋巴结清扫数目、腹腔阳性淋巴结数目以及术后并发症发生率方面差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 对于Siewert Ⅱ型食管胃结合部腺癌患者,胸腹联合右胸人路手术安全有效,胸腔淋巴结清扫更具优势,且患者生存获益更多,建议临床推广.
Clinical efficacy of different surgical approaches in the treatment of Siewert type Ⅱ adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction:A retrospective cohort study
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of different surgical approaches for Siewert type Ⅱadenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction(AEG).Methods The clinical data of the patients with Siewert type Ⅱ AEG who received sugeries in the Department of Thoracic Surgery of Gansu Provincial People's Hospital from August 2014 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed.The patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical approach:a transabdominal group(transabdominal diaphragmatic esophageal hiatus approach)and a combined group(thoracoabdominal combined with right thoracic approach).Perioperative clinical data and postoperative follow-up data were collected to compare the short-and long-term efficacy of the two groups.Results A total of 87 patients were enrolled.There were 48 patients(31 males and 17 females,with an average age of 60.85±8.47 years)in the transabdominal group,and 39 patients(25 males and 14 females,with an average age of 61.13±8.51 years)in the combined group.There was no statistical difference between the two groups in the baseline indicators such as gender,age,tumor size and stage(P>0.05).Compared with the combined group,the operation time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative bed rest time,postoperative total drainage volume were shorter or less,and the visual analogue scale score on the 3rd day after surgery were lower in the transabdominal group(P<0.05).However,the total number of lymph nodes dissected,the number of thoracic lymph nodes dissected and the number of positive thoracic lymph nodes in the combined group were larger than those in the transabdominal group,and the differences were statistically significant(P=0.001).The median survival time in the combined group and transabdominal group was 25.85 months and 20.86 months,respectively.The 3-year overall survival rate of the combined group was higher than that of the transabdominal group(46.2%vs.38.9%,x2=5.995,P=0.014).However,there was no statistical difference between the two groups in the postoperative catheter time,esophageal and gastric resection margin distance,number of abdominal lymph nodes dissected,number of positive abdominal lymph nodes,or incidence of postoperative complications(P>0.05).Conclusion For patients with Siewert type Ⅱ adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction,thoracoabdominal combined with right thoracic approach is safe and effective,and has advantages in thoracic lymph node dissection,bringing more benefits to the patients,so it is recommended to be popularized in clinical practice.

Adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junctionSiewert type Ⅱtransabdominal diaphragmatic esophageal hiatus approachthoracoabdominal combined with right thoracic approachlymph node dissectionsurvival benefit

白向豆、苟文曦、洪子强、崔百强、金大成、苟云久

展开 >

甘肃中医药大学第一临床医学院(兰州 730000)

南方医科大学(广州 510000)

甘肃省人民医院胸外一科(兰州 730000)

食管胃结合部腺癌 SiewertⅡ型 经腹膈肌食管裂孔人路 胸腹联合右胸人路 淋巴结清扫 生存获益

甘肃省科技计划甘肃省人民医院科技创新平台青年基金甘肃省优秀研究生创新之星项目

20JR10RA388ZX-62000001-2021-2902022CXZX-741

2024

中国胸心血管外科临床杂志
四川大学华西医院

中国胸心血管外科临床杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:0.846
ISSN:1007-4848
年,卷(期):2024.31(3)
  • 19