首页|手功能康复护理对手部烧伤患者的效果评价

手功能康复护理对手部烧伤患者的效果评价

扫码查看
目的 研究手部烧伤病人住院期间接受手功能康复护理方案对其疼痛、生活能力的影响.方法 2022年1-6月于本院接受治疗的手部烧伤病人80例,采用奇偶数字法将其对等分为2组,对照组(n=40),住院期间采用常规护理方案,研究组(n=40)则于常规护理前提下采用手功能康复护理方案,以手部功能(MHQ)、疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、日常生活能力(Barthel评分系统)、并发症发生情况、简易生活质量评估表(SF-36)以及护理满意度作为评价指标,对比2组护理效果.结果 护理后,研究组手活动功能评分为(7.71±1.08)分、手功能评分为(6.16±1.02)分,对照组为(12.67±2.03)分、(10.15±1.94)分,组间对比差异具有统计学意义(t=13.642、11.513,P均<0.05);研究组VAS评分为(2.42±0.63)分,对照组为(4.33±0.56)分,差异具有统计学意义(t=14.331,P<0.05);研究组Barthel评分为(88.05±4.38)分,对照组为(76.42±4.33)分,组间对比差异具有统计学意义(t=1 1.942,P<0.05);研究组并发症发生率为2.50%,对照组为22.50%,差异具有统计学意义(x2=5.600,P<0.05);研究组SF-36评分为(85.26±3.42)分、护理满意度评分为(93.01±3.39)分,对照组为(69.21±3.38)分、(78.45±3.87)分,组间对比差异具有统计学意义(t=21.110、17.898,P均<0.05).结论 手部烧伤病人于住院期间接受手功能康复护理方案可有效缓解其疼痛,促进其手部功能恢复,减少并发症,护理满意度较高.
Evaluation of effect of hand function rehabilitation nursing in patients with hand burns
Objective To study the effect of hand function rehabilitation nursing programs on the pain and life abil-ity of patients with hand burns during hospitalization.Methods From January 2022 to June 2022,80 patients with hand burns who were treated in our hospital were divided into two groups by the odd and even number method.The control group(n=40)received the routine nursing plan during hospitalization,and the study group(n=40)received the hand function reha-bilitation nursing plan under the premise of routine nursing.Hand function(Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire,MHQ),pain visual analogue score(VAS),daily living ability(Barthel Score System),the incidence of complications,short form 36 questionnaires(SF-36),and nursing satisfaction were used as evaluation indicators.The effects of the two groups were com-pared.Results After nursing,the hand activity function score and the hand function score of the study group were(7.71± 1.08)points and(6.16±1.02)points,while the hand activity function score and the hand function score of the control group were(12.67±2.03)points and(10.15±1.94)points respectively.The difference between the two groups was statistically signif-icant(t=13.642,11.513,both P<0.05).The VAS score of the study group was(2.42±0.63)points,while the VAS score of the control group was(4.33±0.56)points,with a statistically significant difference(t=14.331,P<0.05).The Barthel score of the study group was(88.05±4.38)points,while the control group was(76.42±4.33)points,and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(t=11.942,P<0.05).The incidence rate of complications in the study group was 2.50%,while the incidence rate of complications in the control group was 22.50%,the difference between the two groups was statisti-cally significant(x2=5.600,P<0.05).In the study group,the SF-36 score was(85.26±3.42)points,the nursing satisfaction score was(93.01±3.39)points,and in the control group,the SF-36 score was(69.21±3.38)points,the nursing satisfaction score was(78.45±3.87)points.The differences between the two groups were statistically significant(t=21.110,17.898,both P<0.05).Conclusion Patients with hand burns who re-ceive hand function rehabilitation nursing programs during hospitalization can effectively relieve their pain,promote their hand function recovery,reduce complications,and have high nursing satisfaction.

Hand burnsHand functionRehabilitation nursingPainLiving ability

赵文静、何永强、兰静

展开 >

河南电力医院外三(烧伤整形)科,河南郑州 450052

手部烧伤 手功能 康复护理 疼痛 生活能力

2024

中国校医
江苏省预防医学会 中华预防医学会

中国校医

影响因子:0.378
ISSN:1001-7062
年,卷(期):2024.38(2)
  • 12