首页|延展性血液透析在血液透析患者中的有效性及安全性的Meta分析

延展性血液透析在血液透析患者中的有效性及安全性的Meta分析

Efficacy and safety of expanded hemodialysis in hemodialysis patients:a meta-analysis

扫码查看
目的 系统评价延展性血液透析(expanded hemodialysis,HDx)在血液透析(hemodialysis,HD)患者中的有效性和安全性.方法 检索从建库至2022年9月Pubmed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of science、CNKI、万方及维普数据库,搜集报道HDx在HD患者中进行前瞻性干预的临床研究.依据Cochrane协作网的风险偏倚评估对纳入文献进行质量评价,使用RevMan 5.3软件进行Meta分析.结果 共纳入20篇文献,846例患者;按照HD模式,分为HDx组、HD组和血液透析滤过(hemodiafiltration,HDF)组.HDx 组 K t/V值高于 HD 组(ML=0.052,95%CI:0.012~0.092,P=0.012),与 HDF组比较无统计学差异(MD=-0.012,95%CI:-0.118~0.094,P=0.828);HDx 组对 β2微球蛋白(β2 microglobulin,β 2-MG)的清除高于 HD 组(MD=6.542,95%CI:3.411~9.672,P<0.001),低于 HDF 组(MD-3.733,95%CI:-5.262~-2.203,P<0.001);HDx 组对人免疫球蛋白 κ 自由轻链(human immunoglobulin κ free light chain,κ FLC)及人免疫球蛋白 λ自由轻链(human immunoglobulin λ free light chain,λFLC)的清除高于 HD组(κ FLC:MD=15.793,95%CI:9.912~21.674,P<0.001;λ FLC:MD=22.412,95%CI:18.282~26.542,P<0.001),与HDF组相当(κFLC:MD=-2.224,95%CI:-5.408~0.961,P=0.171:λ FLC:MD=0.417,95%CI:-7.945~8.779,P=0.922);HDx组血清白蛋白(albumin,ALB)丢失多于HD组,与HDF组比较无差异(HD:MD=2.010,95%CI:1.327~2.692,P<0.001;HDF:MD=0.050,95%CI:-1.626~1.726,P=0.953);HDx组不良事件的发生与HD及HDF组比较均无差异(HD:MD=0.624,95%CI:0.365~1.066,P=0.084;HDF:MD=0.860,95%CI:0.726~1.020,P=0.141).结论 HDx可增加中、大分子尿毒症毒素的清除,对血管通路不理想者是优选.
Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of expanded hemodialysis(HDx)in hemodialysis(HD)patients.Methods Pubmed,Embase,Cochrane Library,Web of science,CNKI,Wanfang and VIP databases were searched from the establishment of the database to September 2022 for clini-cal and prospective studies on HDx intervention in HD patients.The quality of the included literature was evaluated according to the risk bias assessment of the Cochrane Collaboration Network.Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan5.3 software.Results Twenty trials including 846 HD patients were enrolled for the analyses.They were divided into HDx group,HD group and hemodiafiltration(HDF)group.The Kt/V value in HDx group was significantly higher than that in HD group(MD=0.052,95%CI:0.012~0.092,P=0.012),but there was no significant difference between HDx group and HDF group(MD=-0.012,95%CI:-0.118~0.094,P=0.828).The clearance rate of β2 microglobulin(β2-MG)in HDx group was significantly higher than that in HD group(MD=6.542,95%CI:3.411~9.672,P<0.001),and was lower than that in HDF group(MD=-3.733,95%CI:-5.262~-2.203,P<0.001).The clearance of human immunoglobulin κ free light chain(κFLC)and human immunoglobulin λ free light chain(λFLC)in HDx group was significantly higher than that in HD group(κFLC:MD=1 5.793,95%CI:9.912~21.647,P<0.001;XFLC:MD=22.412,95%CI:18.282~26.542,P<0.001),but was similar to that in HDF group(κFLC:MD=-2.224,95%CI:-5.408~0.961,P=0.171;λFLC:MD=0.417,95%CI:-7.945~8.779,P=0.922).Serum albumin(ALB)loss in HDx group was higher than that in HD group,and there was no difference between HDX group and HDF group(HD:MD=2.010,95%CI:1.327~2.692,P<0.001;HDF:MD=0.050,95%CI:-1.626~1.726,P=0.953).The incidence of adverse events showed no significant difference between the HDx group and both the HD and HDF groups(HD:MD=0.624,95%CI:0.365~1.066,P=0.084;HDF:MD=0.860,95%CI:0.726~1.020,P=0.141).Con-clusion HDx increased the clearance of medium and large molecular weight uremia toxins,and is preferable for patients with unsatisfactory vascular access.

Expanded hemodialysisHemodialysisHemodialysis filtrationEnd-stage renal diseaseMedium interception membrane

丁红赟、姜安雅、颜华仙、周祖莲

展开 >

409000 黔江,重庆市黔江中心医院肾内科

延展性血液透析 血液透析 血液透析滤过 终末期肾病 中截留膜

2024

中国血液净化
中国医院协会

中国血液净化

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.54
ISSN:1671-4091
年,卷(期):2024.23(3)
  • 26