首页|政策工具视角下省(市)级生物医药产业高质量发展政策文本分析

政策工具视角下省(市)级生物医药产业高质量发展政策文本分析

扫码查看
目的:从政策工具视角,结合产业创新价值链维度,总结我国生物医药产业高质量发展政策制定现状,分析政策工具使用偏好,为政策优化调整提供参考.方法:以政策工具为X维度,产业创新价值链为Y维度,采用Rothwell和Zegveld政策工具分类法对我国生物医药产业高质量发展政策文件进行编码和分类,并采用SPSS,Ucinet等工具结合产业创新价值链进行统计分析.结果:在X维度中,环境型政策工具的使用频率最高(50.2%),需求型政策工具的使用频率最低(11.1%).在Y维度中,产业推广阶段的政策工具使用频率最高(44.2%),成果转化阶段的政策工具使用频率最低(27.2%).在双维度视角下,成果转化和产业推广阶段环境型政策工具使用频次最多,在研究开发阶段则是供给型政策工具最多.结论:各省(市)生物医药产业高质量发展政策文件中环境型政策工具使用较多,供给型和需求型政策工具使用相对较少.建议相关部门加强各类型政策工具平衡应用,重点增加需求型政策工具的使用频次,加大信息化投入,并发挥研究主体的创新作用.
Textual analysis of provincial(municipal)biomedical industry quality development policies from the perspective of policy tools
Objective:To summarize the current situation of policy formulation for high-quality development of China's biomedical industry from the perspective of policy tools combined with the value chain dimension of industrial innovation,analyze the preferences of policy tool using,and provide reference for policy optimization and adjustment.Methods:With policy tools as dimension X and industrial innovation value chain as dimension Y,Rothwell and Zegveld policy tools classification methods were used to code and classify policy documents for high-quality development of biomedical industry in China,and tools such as SPSS and Ucinet were used to conduct statistical analysis combined with industrial innovation value chain.Results:In dimension X,environment-based policy tools were used most frequently(50.2%)and demand-based policy tools were used least frequently(11.1%).In dimension Y,the highest frequency of policy tools was used in the industrial promotion stage(44.2%),and the lowest frequency of policy tools was used in the results transformation stage(27.2%).In the two-dimensional perspective,environment-based policy tools were used most frequently in the results transformation and industry promotion stages,and for development stage,supply-based policy tools were most frequently used.Conclusion:Environmental-type tools are more frequently used in policy documents for high-quality development of biomedical industry in each province,and the use of supply-type and demand-type tools is relatively less.It is recommended that the relevant departments strengthen the balanced application of various types of policy tools,focusing on increasing the use of demand-based policy tools,increasing the investment in information technology,and giving full play to the innovative role of the research subjects.

policy toolsbiomedical industryhigh-quality developmentsocial networktext encoding

盛天翊、蒋蓉、邵蓉

展开 >

中国药科大学药品监管科学研究院,南京 211198

国家药品监督管理局药品监管创新与评价重点实验室,南京 211198

政策工具 生物医药产业 高质量发展 社会网络 文本编码

中国科协科技智库青年人才计划(2022)

20220615ZZ07110240

2024

中国新药杂志
中国医药科技出版社 中国医药集团总公司 中国药学会

中国新药杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.039
ISSN:1003-3734
年,卷(期):2024.33(12)