首页|多重制度压力如何影响地方政府环境治理绩效——基于地级市面板数据的动态QCA分析

多重制度压力如何影响地方政府环境治理绩效——基于地级市面板数据的动态QCA分析

扫码查看
加强生态文明制度建设,促进人与自然和谐共生是实现中国式现代化的重要一环.本文基于中国环境治理制度情境,结合组织制度主义理论构建分析框架,以2013-2020年我国地级市面板数据作为案例样本,采用动态QCA方法深入探讨了制度压力影响地方政府环境治理绩效的组合路径及动态变化过程.研究发现,单一制度压力在不同时期均不构成产生高环境治理绩效的必要条件.存在三种典型的高环境治理绩效的制度压力类型,分别是"强制性压力引领型""模仿-规范性压力协同推动型"和"强制、模仿和规范性压力联动型".这几种制度压力组合在研究时间范围内具有较强的稳定性,地方政府环境治理模式具有明显的路径依赖特征,但地方政府环境治理绩效的驱动机制逐渐由强制性压力引领型向强制、模仿和规范性压力联动型转变,多重制度压力的联动效应在地方环境治理中的作用越来越明显.
A Configurational Exploration of How Institutional Pressures Affect Local Governments'Environmental Governance Performance——A Longtitudinal QCA on Prefecture-Level Cities
Institution matters for the economic and environmental development.Adopted from organizational institutionalism theory,this paper constructs an analytical framework to explore the configurational paths of multiple institutional pressures affecting environmental governance performance(EGP)and the dynamic processes.This study uses a dynamic qualitative comparative analysis(QCA)method with the 2013-2020 panel data of prefecture-level cities in China so to incorporate time effect on the performance.The findings include:firstly,single institutional pressure is not a necessary condition for high EGP during any studied period;secondly,we find five configurations of institutional pressures to achieve high EGP,which could be categorized into three models:coercive pressure leading type(M1),mimetic and normative pressure driving type(M2),and coercive,mimetic and normative pressure linkage type(M3);finally,the between and within consistency analysis shows that the configuration of the five institutional pressures has maintained strong stability over the studied period,which demonstrates the path-dependent characteristics of local environmental governance models.However,the driving mechanism of EGP gradually transformed from M1 to M3,showing that the synergistic effect of multiple institutional pressures play more and more roles in local environmental governance.

institutional pressureenvironmental governance performancedynamic QCAconfigurational analysis

谢文栋、王峰

展开 >

上海财经大学公共经济与管理学院,上海 200433

制度压力 环境治理绩效 动态QCA 组态视角

国家自然科学基金面上项目国家社会科学基金重大项目中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目

7227411823&ZD095CXJJ-2023-356

2024

中国行政管理
中国行政管理学会

中国行政管理

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:2.082
ISSN:1006-0863
年,卷(期):2024.40(1)
  • 60