"Mobilization"and"Autonomy":Differentiated Action Logic for Government-level Interactions
The effectiveness of policy implementation is affected by multiple factors in the implementation entity and the implementation process.Clarifying the action logic between intermediate governments and grassroots governments in the process of policy implementation is helpful to identify the impact mechanism of policy effectiveness.This paper conducts field observations on the straw burning control action in H Province,and analyzes the matching difference between intermediate government mobilization behavior and grassroots government autonomous behavior based on the triple dimension of"process-organization-type".It is found that mobilization usually occurs at a clear time point,but grassroots governments have a certain autonomy in response to policy implementation.Mobilization can help the implementation process,but possible conflicts in the process of policy implementation still rely on the autonomous regulation of local governments.The mobilization content does not have strong constraints,and the autonomy of the grassroots government is a softening of"constraints"and localization of policies.The effectiveness of governance depends on the interaction between mobilization behavior and autonomous behavior.The autonomy of grassroots governments needs to be within a reasonable threshold to meet the value balance between policy objectives and governance contexts.
policy implementationpolitical mobilizationgrassroots autonomyenvironmental governancestraw-burning control
NETL
NSTL
万方数据
