中国循证心血管医学杂志2024,Vol.16Issue(1) :18-23.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4055.2024.01.04

移动医疗管理高血压患者服药依从性效果的系统评价再评价

Effectiveness of mHealth management on medication compliance in patients with hypertension:a re-review on systematic reviews

周雪迎 蔡文静 冯静宜 张雪芳
中国循证心血管医学杂志2024,Vol.16Issue(1) :18-23.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4055.2024.01.04

移动医疗管理高血压患者服药依从性效果的系统评价再评价

Effectiveness of mHealth management on medication compliance in patients with hypertension:a re-review on systematic reviews

周雪迎 1蔡文静 1冯静宜 1张雪芳2
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 210023 南京,南京中医药大学护理学院
  • 2. 210022 南京,南京中医药大学附属南京中医院质量管理办公室
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 研究表明,移动医疗护理能使高血压患者在降低心血管风险等方面受益,目前已有较多关于移动医疗管理高血压患者服药依从性效果的系统评价/Meta分析,但其方法学质量和证据强度有待进一步系统性评估.因此,本研究对移动医疗干预高血压患者服药依从性效果的系统评价进行再评价,为临床决策提供指导.方法 计算机检索中国知网、万方、维普、中国生物医学文献数据库、PubMed、Web of Science、CINAHL、EMbase、the Cochrane Library、澳大利亚乔安娜布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute,JBI)循证卫生保健中心数据库,收集关于移动医疗管理高血压患者服药依从性相关的系统评价/Meta分析.检索时限为建库至2023年1月31日.由2名研究者独立进行文献筛选、资料提取,并评价文献质量与证据分级.结果 共纳入11篇系统评价/Meta分析,方法学质量评价结果显示1篇文献质量中等,2篇为低级,8篇为极低.采用GRADE评价结果显示定量分析中23项指标包括中级证据9项,低级证据5项,极低级证据9项.结论 移动医疗技术在改善高血压管理中发挥积极作用,但相关系统评价/Meta分析方法学质量与结局指标证据等级普遍不高.未来进行相关临床决策时,需要具体问题具体分析;同时研究人员应提供更多设计严谨、报告规范的系统评价,作为高质量证据帮助临床决策.

Abstract

Objective To re-review the systematic reviews on effectiveness of mobile health care(mHealth)management on medication compliance in patients with hypertension,and provide the guide to clinical decision.Methods The databases of CNKI,WanFang Data,VIP,CBM,PubMed,Web of Science,CINAHL,EMbase,the Cochrane Library and JBI were retrieved with computer to collect the systematic reviews/Meta-analyses on mHealth managing medication compliance in patients with hypertension.The retrieving time was from database establishment time to Jan.31,2023.The documents were screened,data was extracted and literature quality and evidence grading were carried out by 2 researchers independently.Results There were totally 11 systematic reviews/Meta-analyses included.The results of methodological quality review showed that there was 1 document with medium quality,2 with low quality and 8 with very low quality.The results of GRADE assessment showed that there were 9 intermediate evidences,5 low-level evidences,and 9 very low-level evidences in 23 indexes of quantitative analysis.Conclusion Mobile health technologies play a positive role in improving hypertension management,but the methodological quality and outcome evidences for relevant systematic reviews/Meta-analyses is generally low.In the future,relevant clinical decisions need to be analyzed on a case-by-case basis.At the same time,researchers should provide more well-designed,well-reported systematic reviews as high-quality evidence to aid clinical decision-making.

关键词

高血压/服药依从性/系统评价再评价/GRADE

Key words

Hypertension/Medication compliance/Re-review on systematical evaluation/GRADE

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

江苏省南京市卫生科技发展专项资金项目(YKK19100)

出版年

2024
中国循证心血管医学杂志
中国人民解放军北京军区总医院

中国循证心血管医学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.272
ISSN:1674-4055
参考文献量35
段落导航相关论文