中国循证心血管医学杂志2024,Vol.16Issue(6) :715-719.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4055.2024.06.16

体外反搏治疗对射血分数中间值心力衰竭患者心功能及生活质量影响的临床研究

Clinical study on effects of external counterpulsation on cardiac function and quality of life in patients with heart failure with median ejection fraction

陈斐 陈玮 郭薇薇 方芳 高小泽 周军
中国循证心血管医学杂志2024,Vol.16Issue(6) :715-719.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4055.2024.06.16

体外反搏治疗对射血分数中间值心力衰竭患者心功能及生活质量影响的临床研究

Clinical study on effects of external counterpulsation on cardiac function and quality of life in patients with heart failure with median ejection fraction

陈斐 1陈玮 2郭薇薇 2方芳 2高小泽 2周军2
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 200070 上海,上海市静安区闸北中心医院全科医学科
  • 2. 2200070上海,上海市静安区闸北中心医院心血管内科
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 探讨体外反搏治疗对射血分数中间值心力衰竭(HFmrEF)患者心功能及生活质量影响的临床研究.方法 选取2022年3月至2023年1月于上海市静安区闸北中心医院全科医学科及心内科住院的射血分数中间值的心力衰竭病例80例为研究对象,随机分为体外反搏组和常规药物组,常规药物组均按《2018年中国心力衰竭诊断和治疗指南》,给予常规药物治疗方案;体外反搏组在常规用药的基础上选择体外反搏治疗.对两组患者临床疗效进行比较,对两组患者治疗前、治疗后42 d、3个月、6个月12个月的心功能指标、N末端脑钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)水平和6 min步行试验距离、生活质量以及心血管不良事件情况进行对比.结果 体外反搏组的总有效率为95.00%,明显高于常规药物组总有效率80%(P<0.05);治疗后3个月、6个月,体外反搏组左室射血分数(LVEF)明显高于常规药物组,左房内径(LAD)、左室舒张末内径(LVDd)、左室收缩末内径(LVDs)低于常规药物组,6 min步行试验距离大于常规药物组(P<0.05);治疗后3个月和6个月后,体外反搏组患者血清中NT-proBNP水平明显低于常规药物组,MLHF评 分明显低于常规药物组,心力衰竭再次住院率(15.00%vs.35.00%,P=0.039)明显少于常规药物组(P<0.05).结论 体外反搏治疗HFmrEF患者的效果显著,可明显提高患者心功能.

Abstract

Objective To investigate the effect of external counterpulsation on cardiac function and quality of life in patients with heart failure with median ejection fraction.Methods A total of 80 cases of heart failure with General practice and cardiovascular medicine-median ejection fraction admitted to Zhabei Central Hospital,Jing'a District,Shanghai,from March 2022 to January 2023 were selected as the study objects.and randomly divided into an external counterpulsation group and a conventional drug group.The conventional drug group was given conventional drug treatment according to the《2018 Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Heart Failure》.External counterpulsation treatment was selected based on conventional drugs in the external counterpulsation group.The clinical efficacy of the two groups of patients was compared,and the cardiac function indexes,NT-proBNP level,6-minute walking test distance,quality of life and cardiovascular adverse events of the two groups were compared before treatment,42 days,3 months,6 months and 12 months after treatment.Results The total effective rate of the external counterpulsation group was 95.00%,which was significantly higher than that of the conventional drug group(80%)(P<0.05).At 3 months and 6 months after treatment,LVEF in the ECP group was significantly higher than that in the conventional drug group,LAD,LVDd,and LVDs were lower than that in the conventional drug group,and the 6-minute walking test distance was greater than that in the conventional drug group(P<0.05).At 3 months,6 months after treatment,the serum level of NT-proBNP in the ECP group was significantly lower than that in the conventional drug group,the MLHF score was significantly lower than that in the conventional drug group,and the rate of rehospitalization for heart failure(15.00%vs.35.00%,P=0.039)was significantly lower than that in the conventional drug group(P<0.05).Conclusions Extracorporeal counterpulsation is effective in HFmrEF patients and can significantly improve cardiac function.

关键词

射血分数中间值心力衰竭/体外反搏/临床疗效/心功能

Key words

Median ejection fraction heart failure/External counterpulsation/Clinical effect/Heart function

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

上海市卫生健康委员会科研课题面上项目(202040038)

上海市静安区学科建设项目[培育学科](2021PY02)

上海市静安区卫健委课题基金项目(2020MS05)

出版年

2024
中国循证心血管医学杂志
中国人民解放军北京军区总医院

中国循证心血管医学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.272
ISSN:1674-4055
段落导航相关论文