首页|度普利尤单抗注射液治疗成人中重度特应性皮炎的成本-效用分析

度普利尤单抗注射液治疗成人中重度特应性皮炎的成本-效用分析

扫码查看
目的 从我国卫生体系角度出发,评价度普利尤单抗联合最佳支持治疗方案与最佳支持治疗方案比较用于成人中重度特应性皮炎的经济性.方法 构建嵌入决策树的Markov模型,比较度普利尤单抗联合最佳支持治疗对比最佳支持治疗的长期成本-效用,并对结果进行敏感性分析.结果 基础分析结果表明,相较于最佳支持治疗方案,度普利尤单抗联合最佳支持治疗可使患者多获得3.82个质量调整生命年(QALY),同时其成本多125 549.42元,增量成本-收益比(ICER)为32 854.83元/QALY,低于1倍我国2022年人均GDP,具有经济性.单因素敏感性分析结果显示,度普利尤单抗-16周后的无响应效用值、度普利尤单抗-52周后的应答率和度普利尤单抗-52周的依从性等因素对成本变化有较大影响.概率敏感度分析结果表明模型结构稳定,稳健性较好.结论 对于成人中重度特应性皮炎患者,度普利尤单抗联合最佳支持治疗方案相较于最佳支持治疗方案更具经济性.
Dupilumab injection in the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis in adults:a cost-effectiveness analysis
Objective To evaluate the economics of duplizumab in combination with optimal supportive care versus optimal supportive care for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in adults from the perspective of our health system.Methods A Markov model embedded in a decision tree was constructed to compare the long-term cost-utility of dupilumab combined with optimal supportive care versus optimal supportive care,and a sensitivity analysis was performed on the results.Results The results of the basic analysis showed that compared with the optimal supportive care,dupliyuzumab in combination with optimal supportive care resulted in 3.82 more QALYs,while its cost was 125549.42 yuan more.The ICER was 32 854.83 yuan/QALY,which was less than one times China's per capita GDP in 2022,and was economical.Univariate sensitivity analysis showed that factors such as Dupilumab-16-week post-no response utility value,Dupilumab-52-week post response rate and Dupilumab-52-week adherence had a greater impact on the cost changes.The results of the probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed a stable model structure and good robustness.Conclusion In adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis,dupliyuzumab in combination with an optimal supportive care regimen is more cost-effective compared to an optimal supportive care regimen.

DupilumabOptimal supportive careMarkov modelCost-utility analysis

安琪、孙劲楠、徐伟

展开 >

中国药科大学国际医药商学院(南京 211198)

度普利尤单抗 最佳支持疗法 Markov模型 成本-效用分析

2024

中国循证医学杂志
四川大学

中国循证医学杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.761
ISSN:1672-2531
年,卷(期):2024.24(4)
  • 29