首页|网状Meta分析证据缺失偏倚风险评价工具ROB-MEN中文解读

网状Meta分析证据缺失偏倚风险评价工具ROB-MEN中文解读

扫码查看
研究结果的选择性不报告和发表偏倚影响系统评价和Meta分析的效度,进而影响临床决策的制定.目前缺乏严格的方法评价网状Meta分析证据缺失偏倚风险.本文介绍网状Meta分析证据缺失偏倚风险评价工具ROB-MEN的主要内容,包括其工具表格、操作过程以及相关信号问题等.ROB-MEN工具的关键内容是两两比较表和ROB-MEN表,可应用于干预措施多、网络结构复杂的网状Meta分析,避免偏倚风险评价过程耗时久且耗费大量人力物力.同时ROB-MEN具有逻辑清晰、细节严谨、可用性强等优点,是首个评价网状Meta分析证据缺失偏倚风险的工具,可为临床研究者提供权威参考,值得推广和应用.
A Chinese introduction to risk of bias due to missing evidence in network meta-analysis(ROB-MEN)
Selective non-reporting and publication bias of study results threaten the validity of systematic reviews and meta-analyses,thus affect clinical decision making.There are no rigorous methods to evaluate the risk of bias in network meta-analyses currently.This paper introduces the main contents of ROB-MEN(risk of bias due to missing evidence in network meta-analysis),including tables of the tool,operation process and signal questions.The pairwise comparisons table and the ROB-MEN table are the tool's core.The ROB-MEN tool can be applied to very large and complex networks including lots of interventions to avoid time-consuming and labor-intensive process,and it has the advantages of clear logic,complete details and good applicability.It is the first tool used to evaluate the risk of bias due to missing evidence in network meta-analysis and is useful to researchers,thus being worth popularizing and applying.

Bias due to missing evidencePublication biasRisk of biasSystematic reviewNetwork meta-analysisPairwise comparison

胡玉鹏、朱涛、邓湘金、曾维、陈金龙、汤炜、刘畅

展开 >

口腔疾病防治全国重点实验室国家口腔医学中心国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心四川大学华西口腔医院口腔颌面外科四川大学"医学+制造"中心(成都 610041)

四川大学华西口腔医院信息管理部口腔医学信息学教研室循证口腔医学教研室(成都 610041)

证据缺失偏倚 发表偏倚 偏倚风险 系统评价 网状Meta分析 两两比较

四川大学华西口腔医学院交叉学科创新项目四川大学"医学+制造"中心探索项目四川省自然科学基金

RD-03-2023032022NSFSC0639

2024

中国循证医学杂志
四川大学

中国循证医学杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.761
ISSN:1672-2531
年,卷(期):2024.24(4)
  • 25