首页|社区老年肌少症筛查工具准确性的网状Meta分析

社区老年肌少症筛查工具准确性的网状Meta分析

扫码查看
目的 采用网状Meta分析的方法评价不同肌少症筛查工具对社区老年肌少症筛查的诊断性能,为准确筛查老年肌少症患者提供循证支持.方法 计算机检索PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、Embase、CINAHL、CNKI、VIP、CBM和WanFangData数据库,搜集肌少症风险筛查工具诊断老年肌少症的相关研究,检索时限均从建库至2023年6月.由2位研究者独立筛选文献、提取资料并评价纳入研究的质量后,采用Stata 15.1和Meta Disc 1.4软件进行数据分析.结果 共纳入24项研究,包含10 961例患者,涉及8个老年肌少症风险筛查工具:小腿围、MSRA-5、MSRA-7、上臂围、指环测试、Ishii评分、SARC-CalF、SARC-F.Meta分析结果显示,8 种筛查工具的合并敏感度依次为 0.84[95%CI(0.61,1.15)]、0.82[95%CI(0.48,1.38)]、0.80[95%CI(0.47,1.36)]、0.72[95%CI(0.33,1.55)]、0.67[95%CI(0.37,1.21)]、0.63[95%CI(0.33,1.19)]、0.49[95%CI(0.38,0.63)]、0.24[95%CI(0.18,0.30)];合并特异度依次为 0.39[95%CI(0.29,0.54)]、0.18[95%CI(0.11,0.29)]、0.15[95%CI(0.09,0.25)]、0.39[95%CI(0.18,0.82)]、0.52[95%CI(0.29,0.93)]、0.54[95%CI(0.29,1.03)]、0.62[95%CI(0.49,0.79)]、0.63[95%CI(0.50,0.78)].网状Meta分析结果显示,8种筛查工具按照敏感度累积排序概率曲线下面积从高到低依次为小腿围(67.4%)>MSRA-5(65.3%)>MSRA-7(64.1%)>上臂围(54.5%)>指环测试(46.5%)>Ishii 评分(43.1%)>SARC-CalF(20.7%)>SARC-F(0.1%);特异度由高到低为:SARC-F(72.2%)>SARC-CalF(71.3%)>Ishii 评分(60.2%)>指环测试(57.1%)>上臂围(40.1%)>小腿围(36.2%)>MSRA-5(10.0%)>MSRA-7(3.6%).结论 常见肌少症简易筛查工具中小腿围测量的敏感度高,SARC-F的特异度较高,医务人员可优先运用两者的结合筛查工具,即SARC-CalF.受纳入研究数量和质量限制,上述结论尚需开展更多高质量研究予以验证.
Accuracy of screening tools for sarcopenia in the elderly in community:a network meta-analysis
Objective To evaluate the diagnostic performance of different screening tools for sarcopenia in the community for the elderly with sarcopenia,and to provide evidence-based support for the accurate screening of elderly patients with sarcopenia.Methods The PubMed,Web of Science,Cochrane Library,Embase,CINAHL,VIP,CBM,and WanFang Data databases were searched by computer,and the relevant research on the diagnosis of sarcopenia in the elderly by publicly published risk screening tools was found.The retrieval time was from inception to June 2023.Two researchers independently screened the literature,extracted data,and evaluated the quality of the included studies,and then data analysis was performed by using Stata 15.1 and Meta Disc 1.4 software.Results A total of 24 studies were included,including 10 961 patients,involving 8 risk screening tools for sarcopenia in the elderly:leg circumference,MSRA-5,MSRA-7,upper arm circumference,ring test,Ishii score,SARC-CalF and SARC-F.Meta-analysis showed that the combined sensitivities of eight screening tools were 0.84(95%CI 0.61 to 1.15),0.82(95%CI 0.48 to 1.38),0.80(95%CI 0.47 to 1.36)and 0.72(95%CI 0.33 to 1.55),0.67(95%CI 0.37 to 1.21),0.63(95%CI 0.33 to 1.19),0.49(95%CI 0.38 to 0.63),0.24(95%CI 0.18 to 0.30),and the combined specificities were 0.39(95%CI 0.18 to 0.82)、0.52(95%CI 0.29 to 0.93)、0.54(95%CI 0.29 to 1.03)、0.62(95%CI 0.49 to 0.79)、0.63(95%CI 0.50 to 0.78).The results of reticular meta-analysis showed that the surface under the cumulative ranking curve(SUCRA)of the eight screening tools ranked from high to low according to the cumulative sensitivity:calf circumference(67.4%)>MSRA-5(65.3%)>MSRA-7(64.1%)>upper arm circumference(54.5%)>ring test(46.5%)>Ishii score.The values of specificity SUCRA from highest to lowest were as follows:SARC-F(72.2%)>SARC-CALF(71.3%)>Ishii score(60.2%)>ring test(57.1%)>upper arm circumference(40.1%)>lower leg circumference(36.2%)>MSRA-5.Conclusion The simple screening tool for common sarcopenia has high sensitivity and high specificity,so medical staff can give priority to the combination of the two screening tools,namely SARC-CalF.Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies,more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.

SarcopeniaAgedScreening toolCommunityNetwork meta-analysis

李娜、王娅鑫、雷青、佘桂芳、孙鸿燕

展开 >

西南医科大学护理学院(四川泸州 646000)

西南医科大学附属医院护理部(四川泸州 646000)

肌少症 老年人 筛查工具 社区 网状Meta分析

四川省科技计划项目

2020YFSY0032

2024

中国循证医学杂志
四川大学

中国循证医学杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.761
ISSN:1672-2531
年,卷(期):2024.24(6)