中国药房2010,Vol.21Issue(2) :157-158.

国产与进口头孢哌酮/舒巴坦治疗下呼吸道感染疗效比较

Curative Effect of Domestic vs. Imported Cefoperazone/ Sulbactam for Lower Respiratory Infection

何志高 翟晓波 鲍思蔚 金丽
中国药房2010,Vol.21Issue(2) :157-158.

国产与进口头孢哌酮/舒巴坦治疗下呼吸道感染疗效比较

Curative Effect of Domestic vs. Imported Cefoperazone/ Sulbactam for Lower Respiratory Infection

何志高 1翟晓波 1鲍思蔚 1金丽1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 上海市东方医院,上海市,200120
  • 折叠

摘要

目的:比较国产与进口头孢哌酮,舒巴坦治疗下呼吸道感染的疗效.方法:回顾性分析我院近2年进口与国产头孢哌酮/舒巴坦治疗下呼吸道感染患者198例和201例的疗效.结果:进口头孢哌酮/舒巴坦组有效率为61.6%,国产头孢哌酮/舒巴坦组有效率为51.7%,差异具有统计学意叉(P<0.05).结论:进口头孢哌酮/舒巴坦治疗下呼吸道感染住院患者的疗效优于国产品.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the curative effect of domestic cefoperazone/sulbactam and imported one for lower respiratory infection. METHODS: The curative effects of domestice vs. imported cefoperazone/sulbactam in 201 vs. 198 patients with lower respiratory infection in recent two years in our hospital were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: The effective rate was 61.6% for imported product and 51.7% for domestic product. Significant difference was noted between 2 groups statistically (P< 0.05). CONCLUSION: Imported cefoperazone/sulbactam is superior to domestic one in treatment of lower respiratory infection.

关键词

国产/进口/头孢哌酮/舒巴坦/下呼吸道感染/临床疗效

Key words

Domestic/Imported/Cefoperazone/sulbactam/Lower respiratory infection/Curative effect

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2010
中国药房
中国医院协会,中国药房杂志社

中国药房

CSTPCDCSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.956
ISSN:1001-0408
被引量4
参考文献量5
段落导航相关论文