首页|引入等值生命年获益优化成本-效用分析——以RAS突变型转移性结直肠癌为例

引入等值生命年获益优化成本-效用分析——以RAS突变型转移性结直肠癌为例

扫码查看
目的 为我国药物经济学评估方法的完善和卫生经济决策提供参考。方法 从我国医疗卫生体系的角度出发,基于BECOME研究构建三状态分区生存模型,分别以质量调整生命年(QALY)和等值生命年获益(evLYG)为健康产出指标,运用成本-效用分析法评价贝伐珠单抗联合化疗方案对比化疗方案一线治疗RAS突变型转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)的经济性。循环周期为2周,研究时限为患者终身,贴现率为5%,意愿支付阈值为1~3倍我国2023年人均国内生产总值(89 358~268 074元)。采用单因素敏感性分析和概率敏感性分析评价结果的稳健性。结果 以QALY为基础计算的贝伐珠单抗联合化疗方案相较于化疗方案的增量成本-效果比(ICER)为330 311。33元/QALY,大于意愿支付阈值(268 074元);以evLYG为基础计算的ICER值为254 085。64元/evLYG,低于意愿支付阈值(268 074元)。单因素敏感性分析结果显示,贝伐珠单抗成本对ICER值的影响最大。概率敏感性分析结果显示,以QALY为基础进行评估,贝伐珠单抗联合化疗方案更具经济性的概率约为3%;以evLYG为基础进行评估,该方案更加经济的概率上升至56%。结论 采用按evLYG为健康产出指标计算的ICER值对RAS突变型mCRC患者医疗干预方案的经济性进行判断可能比按QALY计算的ICER值更为公平。建议针对特殊人群开展药物经济学评价时,可同时采用QALYs和evLYGs作为健康产出指标进行评估,以实现医疗卫生资源的更优配置,提高决策的公平性。
Optimization of cost-utility analysis with equal value of life-year gained:a case study of RAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer
OBJECTIVE To provide a reference for the improvement of pharmacoeconomic evaluation and health economic decision-making in China.METHODS From the perspective of China's healthcare system,a three-state partitioned survival model was constructed based on the BECOME study,the quality-adjusted life year(QALY)and equal value of life-year gained(evLYG)were used as the health gain measures respectively,and the cost-utility analysis was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy regimen versus chemotherapy alone in the first-line treatment of RAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC).The cycle length was 2 weeks,the time horizon was the patients'lifetime,the discount rate was 5%,and the willingness-to-pay threshold was 1 to 3 times China's gross domestic product per capita in 2023(89 358-268 074 yuan).One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were used to assess the robustness of the results.RESULTS Compared to the chemotherapy alone,the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio(ICER)of the bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy regimen was calculated to be 330 311.33 yuan/QALY based on QALY,which exceeded the willingness-to-pay threshold(268 074 yuan).However,when the ICER was calculated based on evLYG,it was determined to be 254 085.64 yuan/evLYG,which fell below the willingness-to-pay threshold(268 074 yuan).The results of the one-way sensitivity analysis showed that the price of bevacizumab had the greatest impact on the ICER value.The results of the probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that the probability of the bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy regimen being more cost-effective was approximately 3%when assessed by QALY;the probability of the regimen being more cost-effective rose to 56%when assessed by evLYG.CONCLUSIONS When evaluating the cost-effectiveness of interventions for RAS-mutant mCRC,ICER values based on evLYG may provide a fairer measure compared to ICER values calculated by QALY.It is recommended that when pharmacoeconomic evaluations are conducted for special populations,both QALY and evLYG can be used as health outcome indexes for evaluation to achieve a better allocation of healthcare resources and improve the fairness of decision-making.

equal value of life-year gainedquality-adjusted life yearRAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancerpharmacoeconomics

胡钊、管欣、刘永军

展开 >

中国药科大学国际医药商学院,南京 211198

等值生命年获益 质量调整生命年 RAS突变型转移性结直肠癌 药物经济学

江苏高校哲学社会科学研究一般项目

2023SJYB0076

2024

中国药房
中国医院协会,中国药房杂志社

中国药房

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:0.956
ISSN:1001-0408
年,卷(期):2024.35(18)