首页|重组人血管内皮抑制素不同给药方式治疗非小细胞肺癌恶性胸腔积液的有效性和安全性的网状Meta分析

重组人血管内皮抑制素不同给药方式治疗非小细胞肺癌恶性胸腔积液的有效性和安全性的网状Meta分析

扫码查看
目的 系统评价重组人血管内皮抑制素(Endostatin)不同给药方式治疗非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)恶性胸腔积液的有效性和安全性,为临床上规范Endostatin超药品说明书用药提供更多循证依据。方法 计算机检索PubMed、The Cochrane Library、Web of Science、Embase、ChiCTR、VIP、CNKI、WanFang 和 SinoMed 数据库,搜索有关Endostatin单用或联合化疗治疗NSCLC恶性胸腔积液的随机对照试验。运用Stata 14。0软件进行网状Meta分析。结果 共纳入50篇RCT,合计3 429例患者,涉及5种干预措施。网状Meta结果显示,在临床有效率方面,Endostatin(胸腔灌注)+化疗(胸腔灌注或静脉滴注)与Endostatin(静脉滴注)+化疗(胸腔灌注或静脉滴注)、Endostatin(胸腔灌注)与化疗(胸腔灌注)比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0。05);Endostatin(胸腔灌注)+化疗(胸腔灌注或静脉滴注)与Endostatin(胸腔灌注)[OR=3。44,95%CI(2。29,5。16),P<0。05]、Endostatin(胸腔灌注)+化疗(胸腔灌注或静脉滴注)与化疗(胸腔灌注)[OR=3。78,95%CI(3。16,4。51),P<0。05]比较,差异有统计学意义;累积排序概率曲线下面积显示Endostatin(胸腔灌注)+化疗(胸腔灌注或静脉滴注)>Endostatin(静脉滴注)+化疗(胸腔灌注或静脉滴注)>Endostatin(胸腔灌注)>化疗(胸腔灌注)>化疗(静脉滴注)。不同干预措施胃肠道反应、白细胞及血小板减少发生率的组间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0。05)。结论 Endostatin胸腔灌注或静脉滴注联合一线化疗药物均可显著提高NSCLC恶性胸腔积液的临床有效率,但其胸腔灌注疗效更佳且安全性较好。
A network Meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of different administration routes of recombinant human endostatin in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer with malignant pleural effusion
Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of different administration methods of recombinant human endostatin(Endostatin)in the treatment of malignant pleural effusion in non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC),and to provide more evidence-based bases for the clinical standardization of the use of Endostatin beyond the drug specification.Methods PubMed,The Cochrane Library,Web of Science,Embase,ChiCTR,VIP,CNKI,WanFang,and SinoMed databases were searched by computer for randomized controlled trials(RCT)of Endostatin alone or combined with chemotherapy for malignant pleural effusion in NSCLC.Network Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 14.0 software.Results A total of 50 RCTs involving 3 429 patients were included,covering 5 intervention measures.Network Meta-analysis showed that in terms of clinical effectiveness,there was no statistically significant difference between Endostatin(thoracic perfusion)+chemotherapeutic drug(thoracic perfusion or intravenous drip)and Endostatin(intravenous drip)+chemotherapeutic drug(thoracic perfusion or intravenous drip),and Endostatin(thoracic perfusion)and chemotherapeutic drug(thoracic perfusion)(P>0.05);there were statistically differences between Endostatin(thoracic perfusion)+chemotherapeutic drug(thoracic perfusion or intravenous drip)and Endostatin(thoracic perfusion)[OR=3.44,95%CI(2.29,4.50),P<0.05],and Endostatin(thoracic perfusion)+chemotherapeutic drug(thoracic perfusion or intravenous drip)and chemotherapeutic drug(thoracic perfusion)[OR=3.78,95%CI(3.16,4.51),P<0.05](P<0.05).The surface under the cumulative ranking curve(SUCRA)showed that Endostatin(thoracic perfusion)+chemotherapeutic drug(thoracic perfusion or intravenous drip)>Endostatin(intravenous drip)+chemotherapeutic drug(thoracic perfusion or intravenous drip)>Endostatin(thoracic perfusion)>chemotherapeutic drug(thoracic perfusion)>chemotherapeutic drug(intravenous drip).In terms of adverse effects,such as gastrointestinal reaction,and reduction of white blood cells and platelets,there was no statistically significant difference among the different interventions(P>0.05).Conclusion Endostatin either by pleural instillation or combined with first-line chemotherapy drugs significantly improves clinical efficacy in malignant pleural effusion in NSCLC,and it is better and safer with thoracic perfusion efficacy.

Recombinant human endostatinAdministration routesNon-small cell lung cancerMalignant pleural effusionNetwork Meta-analysisIntravenous dripPleural effusion

徐转转、涂超超、龚章沁、郭迎奥、涂明利

展开 >

湖北医药学院附属随州医院呼吸与危重症医学科(湖北随州 441300)

孝昌县第一人民医院呼吸内科(湖北孝感 432900)

重组人血管内皮抑制素 给药方式 非小细胞肺癌 恶性胸腔积液 网状Meta分析 静脉滴注 胸腔积液

2024

中国药师
国家药品监督管理局高级研修学院,武汉医药(集团)股份有限公司

中国药师

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.944
ISSN:1008-049X
年,卷(期):2024.27(4)
  • 58