Whether to Abolish or Introduce Dual Regulation as Trade and Environmental Policy?

扫码查看

原文链接

万方数据

外文摘要：China,which has already introduced an environmental tax in an effort to decarbonize,has recently begun emissions trading and is using two environmental policies in tandem,but there are concerns about the impact on growth and trade.Trade and environmental policies affect firms'entry and exit,resulting in changes in aggregate productivity and pollution emissions.This study compares the impacts of single regulation and dual regulation on welfare,using a research-and-development based growth model with heterogeneous firms.Under single regulation,the cleansing effect of trade liberalization could be undermined.Under dual regulation,trade liberalization decreases pollution and improves average productivity whereas decreasing total permits reduces pollution.From the perspective of improving welfare it is desirable to choose dual regulation because trade liberalization can reduce total pollution emissions via the cleansing effect of trade liberalization.

外文关键词：

dual regulationheterogeneous firmPorter hypothesisresearch and development difficultytrade liberalization

作者：

Yoshihiro Hamaguchi

展开 >

作者单位：

Department of Economics,Faculty of Economics and Business Administration,Kyoto University of Advanced Science,Japan

基金：

Early Career Scientists from the Japan Society for the Promotion of ScienceEarly Career Scientists from the Japan Society for the Promotion of ScienceEarly Career Scientists from the Japan Society for the Promotion of ScienceEarly Career Scientists from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

项目编号：

19K1370622K13409JP19K13706JP22K13409

出版年：

2024

中国与世界经济(英文版)

中国社会科学院世界经济与政治研究所

中国与世界经济(英文版)

ISSN：1671-2234

年,卷(期)：2024.32(1)

参考文献量76