首页|冠状动脉定量血流分数与心脏磁共振评估冠心病患者心肌缺血的一致性研究

冠状动脉定量血流分数与心脏磁共振评估冠心病患者心肌缺血的一致性研究

The consistency study of quantitative coronary flow fraction and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary heart disease

扫码查看
目的 评价冠状动脉定量血流分数(QFR)和心脏磁共振(CMR)评估冠心病(CAD)患者心肌缺血的相关性和一致性.方法 回顾性分析2017年8月至2022年3月在首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院行负荷CMR检查和冠状动脉造影的冠心病患者资料.CMR检查包括心脏电影、负荷/静息心肌灌注成像和延迟增强序列.根据CMR检查结果将患者左室心肌节段分为正常节段组、异常节段组(进一步分为缺血节段组和梗死节段组).在冠状动脉造影基础上,应用基于人工智能基础的平台(AngioPlus系统)计算患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术前冠状动脉QFR值.采用Kappa检验分析评价QFR和CMR诊断异常心肌的一致性;采用Mann-Whitney U检验比较组间QFR差异;采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评价QFR诊断异常心肌的效能;采用Spearman相关分析明确患者心肌梗死面积与供血冠状动脉QFR值之间的关系.结果 入组70例CAD患者中,男60例、女10例,年龄(54.1±11.1)岁.在血管水平,QFR和CMR诊断心肌损伤(含缺血和梗死)的一致性中等(Kappa值=0.514),检出CAD患者异常心肌节段的灵敏度为57%,特异度为91%,QFR预测CAD患者异常心肌的AUC值为0.769,最佳截断值为QFR=0.865,此时QFR预测CAD患者心肌损伤的灵敏度为67.2%,特异度为84.3%.正常节段组、缺血节段组和梗死节段组的血管QFR比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.001),其中梗死节段组QFR值明显低于其他两组(均P<0.01).心肌梗死范围与供血冠状动脉QFR值呈负相关(r=-0.45,P<0.001).在患者水平,QFR和CMR诊断心肌损伤(含缺血和梗死)的一致性中等(Kappa值=0.445),诊断CAD患者心肌损伤的灵敏度为74%,特异度为81%.结论 与CMR比较,QFR检出CAD患者心肌损伤具有较好的特异度.梗死节段组QFR值明显低于缺血组和正常组.心肌梗死面积与供血冠状动脉QFR值呈负相关.
Objective To evaluate the correlation and consistency between quantitative coronary flow fraction(QFR)and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging(CMR)in assessing myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary heart disease(CAD).Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of coronary heart disease patients who underwent load CMR examination and coronary angiography at the Beijing Anzhen Hospital,Capital Medical University from August 2017 to March 2022.CMR examination includes cardiac cine,load/rest myocardial perfusion imaging,and delayed enhancement sequence.According to the results of CMR examination,the patient's left ventricular myocardial segments were divided into normal segment group and abnormal segment group(further divided into ischemic segment group and infarcted segment group).On the basis of coronary angiography,an artificial intelligence based platform(AngioPlus system)was applied to calculate the preoperative coronary artery QFR value of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention treatment.Kappa test was used to evaluate the consistency of QFR and CMR in diagnosing abnormal myocardium;Mann Whitney U test was used to compare the differences in QFR between groups;The receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve was used to evaluate the efficacy of QFR in diagnosing abnormal myocardium;Spearman correlation analysis was used to clarify the relationship between myocardial infarction area and QFR value of the supplying coronary artery in patients.Results Among the 70 CAD patients enrolled,there were 60 males and 10 females,aged(54.1± 11.1)years.At the vascular level,the consistency between QFR and CMR in diagnosing myocardial injury(including ischemia and infarction)is moderate(Kappa value=0.514).The sensitivity and specificity of detecting abnormal myocardial segments in CAD patients were 57%and 91%,respectively.The area under the curve(AUC)value of QFR predicting abnormal myocardium in CAD patients was 0.769,and the optimal cutoff value was QFR=0.865.At this time,the sensitivity and specificity of QFR predicting myocardial injury in CAD patients were 67.2%and 84.3%,respectively.The difference in vascular QFR between the normal segment group,ischemic segment group,and infarcted segment group was statistically significant(P<0.001),with the infarcted segment group having significantly lower QFR values than the other two groups(all P<0.01).The range of myocardial infarction was negatively correlated with the QFR value of the supplying coronary artery(r=-0.45,P<0.001).At the patient level,the consistency between QFR and CMR in diagnosing myocardial injury(including ischemia and infarction)was moderate(Kappa value=0.445),with a sensitivity of 74%and a specificity of 81%for diagnosing myocardial injury in CAD patients.Conclusions Compared with CMR,QFR has better specificity in detecting myocardial injury in CAD patients.The QFR value of the infarcted segment group is significantly lower than that of the ischemic group and the normal group.The area of myocardial infarction is negatively correlated with the QFR value of the supplying coronary artery.

Cardiac imaging techniquesMagnetic resonance imagingQuantitative flow ratioCoronary diseaseMyocardial ischemia

惠可尧、赵蕾、张臣、张洪博、齐疏影、高海、马晓海

展开 >

首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院介入诊疗科,北京 100029

首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院医学影像科,北京 100029

首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院冠心病中心急诊冠脉病区,北京 100029

心脏成像技术 磁共振成像 定量血流分数 冠心病 心肌缺血

国家自然科学基金北京市自然科学基金北京市自然科学基金

8207187572120257222302

2024

中国医师杂志
中华医学会 湖南省医学会

中国医师杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.876
ISSN:1008-1372
年,卷(期):2024.26(1)
  • 1