首页|无托槽隐形矫治器和唇侧固定矫治器对正畸患者牙周状况及牙根吸收的影响

无托槽隐形矫治器和唇侧固定矫治器对正畸患者牙周状况及牙根吸收的影响

The effects of invisible orthodontic appliances without brackets and labial fixed orthodontic appliances on periodontal status and root resorption in orthodontic patients

扫码查看
目的 比较无托槽隐形矫治器和唇侧固定矫治器对正畸患者牙周状况及牙根吸收的影响.方法 选取2019年1月至2022年10月就诊于济宁医学院附属医院的102例正畸患者为研究对象,按治疗方法不同分为A组(n=52)、B组(n=50),A组使用无托槽隐形矫治器治疗,B组使用唇侧固定矫治器治疗.比较两组治疗完成时间、牙根吸收情况及治疗前后牙周健康指标[菌斑指数(PLI)、牙龈指数(GI)、龈沟出血指数(SBI)]、龈沟液炎症因子[白介素1β(IL-1β)、可溶性细胞间黏附分子-1(sICAM-1)]水平.结果 A组完成治疗时间长于B组[(34.62±4.28)个月vs(28.93± 3.11)个月](P<0.01).治疗结束后,A组牙根吸收发生率为50.96%,B组为78.00%,A组明显低于B组(P<0.05),A组无牙根吸收>3 mm者,B组牙根吸收>3 mm者占比为0.50%.治疗后,两组 PLI、CI、SBI 与龈沟液 IL-1β、sICAM-1 水平均升高,A 组低于 B 组[(1.26±0.39)分 vs(1.73± 0.54)分、(1.33±0.25)分 vs(2.06±0.46)分、(1.73±0.40)分 vs(2.48±0.50)分、(173.74± 25.81)ng/ml vs(196.33±31.52)ng/ml、(42.28±5.16)μg/L vs(56.59±7.38)μg/L](均 P<0.05).结论 无托槽隐形矫治器虽不能缩短完成治疗时间,但在抑制牙根吸收、改善牙周健康状况、减轻炎症反应等方面具有优势,临床可根据患者具体情况选择合适的矫治器.
Objective To compare the effects of invisible orthodontic appliances without brackets and labial fixed orthodontic appliances on periodontal status and root resorption in orthodontic patients.Methods A retrospective study was conducted on 102 orthodontic patients who visited the Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University from January 2019 to October 2022.According to different treatment methods,they were divided into group A(n=52)and group B(n=50).Group A was treated with invisible orthodontic appliances without brackets,while group B was treated with labial fixed orthodontic appliances.We compared two groups of treatment completion time,root resorption,and periodontal health indicators before and after treatment,including plaque index(PLI),gingival index(GI),gingival sulcus bleeding index(SBI),and levels of inflammatory factors in gingival crevicular fluid,including interleukin-1β(IL-1β)and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1(sICAM-1).Results The completion time of treatment in the Group A was longer than that in the group B[(34.62±4.28)months vs(28.93± 3.11)months](P<0.01).After treatment,the incidence of root resorption in the group A was 50.96%,while in the group B it was 78.00%.The group A was significantly lower than the group B(P<0.05),with no root resorption greater than 3 mm in the group A and 0.50%in the group B.After treatment,the levels of PLI,GI,SBI,and IL-1β and sICAM-1 in gingival crevicular fluid increased in both groups,with the group A being lower than group B[(1.26±0.39)points vs(1.73±0.54)points,(1.33± 0.25)points vs(2.06±0.46)points,(1.73±0.40)points vs(2.48±0.50)points,(173.74± 25.81)ng/mlvs(196.33±31.52)ng/ml,(42.28±5.16)μg/L vs(56.59±7.38)μg/L](all P<0.05).Conclusions Although invisible orthodontic appliances without brackets cannot shorten the completion time of treatment,they have advantages in inhibiting root resorption,improving periodontal health,and reducing inflammatory reactions.Clinically,appropriate appliances can be selected based on the specific situation of patients.

Orthodontic appliances,fixedOrthodontic appliances,removableOrthodontics,correctiveRoot resorption

郑琳琳、王秀奎、范海霞、李然

展开 >

济宁医学院附属医院口腔正畸科,济宁 272000

固定正畸矫正器 正畸矫正器,可摘式 正畸学,矫正 牙根吸收

济宁市重点研发计划项目山东省济宁医学院科研扶持基金

2022YXNS059JYFC2019FKJ168

2024

中国医师杂志
中华医学会 湖南省医学会

中国医师杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.876
ISSN:1008-1372
年,卷(期):2024.26(1)
  • 1
  • 21