首页|磁共振成像与病理学多参数预测中晚期乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效的价值

磁共振成像与病理学多参数预测中晚期乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效的价值

扫码查看
目的 探讨常规磁共振成像(MRI)、弥散加权成像(DWI)、扩散峰度成像(DKI)检查序列联合病理学检查多参数预测中晚期乳腺癌新辅助化疗(NAC)疗效的价值。方法 回顾性分析2022年3月至2023年5月济宁医学院附属医院经病理证实为中晚期乳腺癌并进行NAC的65例患者临床资料,其中病理完全缓解(pCR)组20例,非pCR组45例;所有患者均行常规MRI、DWI、DKI检查并进行病理学分析。分析两组间的临床病理资料及常规MRI征象和表观扩散系数(ADC)值、平均峰度参数(MK)及平均扩散系数(MD);比较两组各参数差异,并绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线比较其预测乳腺癌NAC疗效的效能。结果 pCR组与非pCR组的分子分型、雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)、人表皮生长因子受体2(Her-2)及Ki-67比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0。05),pCR组多见Her-2过表达型及三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)型乳腺癌,ER、PR多呈阴性表达,而Her-2多呈阳性表达,Ki-67以阳性表达为主。pCR组与非pCR组的肿瘤T2WI信号比较差异有统计学意义(P<0。05),pCR组多表现为T2WI中等/低信号。pCR组的ADC值及MD值均低于非pCR组,MK值高于非pCR组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0。001)。临床病理学模型预测NAC疗效的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为 0。829,高于分子亚型、ER、PR、Her-2 及 Ki-67 的 AUC(Z=3。008、2。697、2。815、2。131、2。376,均P<0。05);DKI+DWI联合模型预测NAC疗效的AUC为0。934,大于DWI单一序列模型,差异具有统计学意义(Z=2。396、P=0。017);DKI+DWI模型诊断效能均高于单一参数ADC、MD及MK,且差异均具有统计学意义(Z=2。396、2。219、2。161,均P<0。05);影像+病理联合模型AUC为0。983,诊断效能高于常规MRI特征模型、病理学模型、DWI模型及DKI模型,差异均具有统计学意义(Z=5。877、2。961、3。240、2。264,均P<0。05)。结论 pCR与非pCR乳腺癌患者的病理学、常规MRI、DWI及DKI多参数结果差异性较大,且联合模型对NAC疗效的预测效能优于单一模型。
The value of magnetic resonance imaging and pathological multi parameters in predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer
Objective To explore the value of conventional magnetic resonance imaging(MRI),diffusion weighted imaging(DWI),diffusion kurtosis imaging(DKI)sequence and pathological examination in predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NAC)in advanced breast cancer.Methods The clinical data of 65 cases of advanced breast cancer with NAC confirmed by pathology in the Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University from March 2022 to May 2023 were retrospectively analyzed,including 20 cases in the pathological complete remission(pCR)group and 45 cases in the non pCR group;All patients underwent routine MRI,DWI,DKI examinations and pathological analysis.The clinical pathological data,routine MRI features,apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC)values,mean kurtosis coefficient(MK),and mean diffusion coefficient(MD)between the two groups were analyzed;We compared the differences in various parameters between two groups and plotted receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curves to compare their diagnostic efficacy of NAC in breast cancer.Results There were significant differences in molecular typing,estrogen receptor(ER),progesterone receptor(PR),human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(Her-2)and Ki-67 between pCR group and non pCR group(all P<0.05).In pCR group,Her-2 overexpression type and triple negative breast cancer(TNBC)type breast cancer were more common.ER and PR were mostly negative,Her-2 was mostly positive,and Ki 67 was mainly positive.The difference in tumor T2 WI signal between the pCR group and the non pCR group was statistically significant(P<0.05),with the pCR group showing mostly moderate/low T2WI signal.The ADC and MD values of the pCR group were lower than those of the non pCR group,while the MK value of the pCR group was higher than that of the non pCR group,and the differences were statistically significant(all P<0.001).The area under the ROC curve(AUC)for predicting the efficacy of NAC using a clinical pathological model was 0.829,which was higher than the AUC of molecular subtypes,ER,PR,Her-2,and Ki-67(Z=3.008,2.697,2.815,2.131,2.376,all P<0.05);The AUC of the DKI+DWI predicting the efficacy of NAC was 0.934,which was higher than that of the DWI single sequence model,and the difference in type was statistically significant(Z=2.396,P=0.017).The diagnostic efficacy of the DKI+DWI model was higher than that of the single parameter ADC,MD,and MK,and the differences were statistically significant(Z=2.396,2.219,2.161,all P<0.05);The AUC of the combined imaging and pathology model was 0.983,and its diagnostic efficacy was higher than that of the conventional MRI feature model,pathology model,DWI model,and DKI model,with statistically significant differences(Z=5.877,2.961,3.240,2.264,all P<0.05).Conclusions The results of pathology,conventional MRI,DWI and DKI parameters of pCR and non pCR breast cancer patients are significantly different,and the combined model is better than the single model in predicting the efficacy of NAC.

Breast neoplasmsMagnetic resonance imagingDiffusion kurtosis imagingNeoadjuvant chemotherapy

王正通、赵凡、李冲冲、陈月芹、孙占国、于昊、史志涛、陈霖、王唯伟

展开 >

济宁医学院附属医院医学影像科,济宁 272029

济宁医学院附属医院肿瘤科,济宁 272029

乳腺肿瘤 磁共振成像 扩散峰度成像 新辅助化疗

山东省中医药科技项目济宁医学院附属医院医学英才培养计划项目济宁市重点研发计划项目济宁市重点研发计划项目

Q-20221322022-yxyc-0102023YXNS0952023YXNS133

2024

中国医师杂志
中华医学会 湖南省医学会

中国医师杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.876
ISSN:1008-1372
年,卷(期):2024.26(9)