首页|列线图分析下颌阻生智牙拔除术后下牙槽神经血管束损伤的风险模型

列线图分析下颌阻生智牙拔除术后下牙槽神经血管束损伤的风险模型

扫码查看
目的 列线图分析下颌阻生智牙拔除术后下牙槽神经血管束损伤的风险模型。方法 回顾性分析2022年2月至2023年11月在宝鸡市中医医院接受下颌阻生智牙拔除术患者193例的临床资料,术后3个月,根据患者是否发生下牙槽神经血管束损伤分为发生组与未发生组。对比两组临床资料,分析下颌阻生智牙拔除术后发生下牙槽神经血管束损伤的影响因素,构建并验证下颌阻生智牙拔除术后发生下牙槽神经血管束损伤的风险模型。结果 术后3个月,193例患者下牙槽神经血管束损伤发生率为12。95%(25/193)。发生组(n=25)年龄≥25岁、性别为女性、阻生深度为低位阻生、关系分类为Class Ⅲ类、下牙槽管(IAC)偏移、阻生牙与IAC的方向关系为Ⅱ~Ⅲ类、阻生牙与IAC的接触关系为Ⅱ~Ⅲ级占比高于未发生组(n=168)(均P<0。05)。年龄(OR=5。280,95%CI:1。856~15。025)、阻生深度(OR=5。766,95%CI:2。026~16。407)、阻生牙与 IAC 的方向关系(OR=4。504,95%CI:1。583~12。816)、阻生牙与 IAC 的接触关系(OR=3。991,95%CI:1。403~11。356)为下颌阻生智牙拔除术后发生下牙槽神经血管束损伤的影响因素(均P<0。05)。列线图模型预测下颌阻生智牙拔除术后发生下牙槽神经血管束损伤的灵敏度为88。00%,特异度为91。07%,曲线下面积为0。906(95%CI:0。748~0。959)。结论 基于年龄、阻生深度、阻生牙与IAC的方向关系、阻生牙与IAC的接触关系构建下颌阻生智牙拔除术后下牙槽神经血管束损伤风险模型,有助于早期评估下牙槽神经血管束损伤风险。
Nomogram risk model of inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle injury after extraction of impacted wisdom teeth
Objective To analyze the nomogram risk model of lower alveolar neurovascular bundle injury after mandibular impacted wisdom tooth extraction.Methods The clinical data of 193 patients who received mandibular impacted wisdom tooth extraction in Baoji Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from February 2022 to November 2023 were retrospectively analyzed.3 months after surgery,the patients were divided into the occurrence group and the non-occurrence group according to whether the inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle injury occurred.By comparing the clinical data of the two groups,the influencing factors of lower alveolar neurovascular bundle injury after mandibular impacted wisdom tooth extraction were analyzed,and the risk model of lower alveolar neurovascular bundle injury after mandibular impacted wisdom tooth extraction was constructed and verified.Results 3 months after operation,the incidence of lower alveolar neurovascular bundle injury in 193 patients was 12.95%(25/193).In the occurrence group(n=25),the age was ≥ 25 years old,the gender was female,the depth of impacted was low impacted,the relationship was classified as Class Ⅲ,the lower alveolar canal(IAC)was offset,the orientation relationship between impacted teeth and IAC was class Ⅱ-Ⅲ,and the contact relationship between impacted teeth and IAC was class Ⅱ-Ⅲ,the proportion of cases in the occurrence group was higher than that in the non-occurrence group(n=168)(all P<0.05).Age(OR=5.280,95%CI:1.856-15.025),depth of impacted teeth(OR=5.766,95%CI:2.026-16.407),direction relationship between impacted teeth and IAC(OR=4.504,95%CI:1.583-12.816),and the contact relationship between impacted teeth and IAC(OR=3.991,95%CI:1.403-11.356)were the influencing factors of lower alveolar neurovascular bundle injury after mandibular impacted wisdom tooth extraction(all P<0.05).The sensitivity,specificity and area under the curve were 88.00%,91.07%,and 0.906(95%CI:0.748-0.959)for the prediction of inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle injury after mandibular impacted wisdom tooth extraction.Conclusions The risk model of lower alveolar neurovascular bundle injury after mandibular impacted wisdom tooth extraction was established based on age,depth of impacted teeth,direction relationship between impacted teeth and IAC,and contact relationship between impacted teeth and IAC,which is helpful for early assessment of lower alveolar neurovascular bundle injury risk.

Tooth extractionMandibular impacted wisdom toothInferior alveolar nerve vascular bundle injurieRisk model

祁海龙、马蓉、付建军

展开 >

宝鸡市中医医院口腔科,宝鸡 721000

拔牙 下颌阻生智牙 下牙槽神经血管束损伤 风险模型

陕西省重点研发计划项目

2020SF-182

2024

中国医师杂志
中华医学会 湖南省医学会

中国医师杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.876
ISSN:1008-1372
年,卷(期):2024.26(10)