"徵""微"讹混的时代层次与异文辨析
The confusion between zheng(徵)and wei(微)and their allographs
王辉1
作者信息
摘要
战国以前文字中"皇/徵""(山几)/微"形体有别,不具备充分的讹混条件,二者未发生系统性讹混.秦汉以后尤其是"微"字从"耳"的写法"微"及其变体出现后,开始与"徵"形近易讹.且"徵""微"在刻本中的用字本身形体也比较接近,导致二者多有混用,广泛分布在出土文献和传世古书中.先秦两汉重要典籍中,二字常以异文形式出现,正、误的辨析,需要综合运用文意、语法、语音等多方面知识.
Abstract
In literature produced before the Warring States,the written forms of zheng(徵)and wei(微)were distinguished from each other which left no possibilities for confusion.Since the Qin and Han dynasties,especially after the appearance of variants related to wei((徽)),a written variant of wei(微),the two characters began to be confused which is frequently attested in unearthed documents and extant historical literature.The differentiation between zheng and wei should take various factors into consideration,including context,grammar and phonetics.
关键词
"徵"/"微"/讹混/时代/异文Key words
zheng(徵)/wei(微)/confusion/phases of change/allograph引用本文复制引用
基金项目
国家社会科学基金(20BYY183)
古文字与中华文明传承发展工程规划项目(G3444)
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据