首页|不同剂量熊去氧胆酸治疗原发性胆汁性胆管炎对实验室检查免疫指标的影响

不同剂量熊去氧胆酸治疗原发性胆汁性胆管炎对实验室检查免疫指标的影响

扫码查看
目的 探究不同剂量熊去氧胆酸治疗原发性胆汁性胆管炎对实检室检查、免疫指标的影响。方法 选取2021年8月至2022年12月在东阳市人民医院巍山分院进行诊治的84例原发性胆汁性胆管炎患者作为研究对象进行回顾性分析,按照随机数字表法分为低剂量组与高剂量组各42例,分别给予低剂量(14~16 mg/kg)及高剂量(29~31 mg/kg)熊去氧胆酸治疗。观察不同剂量熊去氧胆酸治疗的临床效果、实检室检查指标[丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)、天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)、碱性磷酸酶(ALP)、γ-谷氨酰转移酶(GGT)、ALT、血清总胆红素(TBIL)、血清直接胆红素(DBIL)]、氧化应激指标[谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶(GSH-Px)、丙二醛(MDA)和超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)]、免疫指标[免疫球蛋白M(IgM)、免疫球蛋白A(IgA)]及不良反应变化。结果 低剂量组有效23例,应答率55%;高剂量组有效10例,应答率24%,低剂量组应答率高于高剂量组(x2=8。435,P<0。05)。治疗后 2 组 ALT、AST、ALP、GGT、TBIL、DBIL 水平低于治疗前(t低剂量组=41。217、38。201、36。206、31。309、9。859、11。262,均 P<0。01;t 高剂量组=36。334、30。622、30。422、24。247、5。589、4。167,均 P<0。01),且低剂量组ALT、AST、ALP、GGT、TBIL、DBIL 水平低于高剂量组(t=9。456、12。917、11。166、7。930、7。469、4。854,均 P<0。01)。治疗后低剂量组IgM、IgA水平低于高剂量组(t=2。832、4。561,P<0。05)。治疗后低剂量组GSH-Px、SOD水平高于高剂量组(t=9。195、5。009,P<0。05),MDA水平低于高剂量组(t=8。397,P<0。001)。低剂量组不良反应发生率5%;高剂量组不良反应发生率19%,低剂量组低于高剂量组(x2=4。087,P=0。043)。结论 低剂量熊去氧胆酸治疗原发性胆汁性胆管炎效果较佳,安全性较高,且能够有效改善患者肝功能,减轻氧化应激,提高机体免疫功能。
Effect of different doses of ursodeoxycholic acid on biochemical and immunological indices in the treat-ment of primary biliary cholangitis
Objective To investigate the effects of different doses of ursodeoxycholic acid on biochemical and immunological indices in the treatment of primary biliary cholangitis.Methods A total of eighty-four patients with primary biliary cholangitis,who were diagnosed and treated in our hospital from August 2021 to December 2022,were selected for retrospective analysis.They were divided into a low-dose group and a high-dose group ac-cording to the random number table method,with 42 patients in each group.The low-dose group received ur-sodeoxycholic acid at a dose of 14~16 mg/kg,while the high-dose group received ursodeoxycholic acid at a dose of 29~31 mg/kg.The clinical effects,biochemical indexes(including alanine aminotransferase(ALT),aspartate aminotransferase(AST),alkaline phosphatase(ALP),gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase(GGT),serum total bilirubin(TBIL),and serum direct bilirubin(DBIL),oxidative stress indicators[including glutathione peroxidase(GSH-Px),malondialdehyde(MDA),and superoxide dismutase(SOD)],immunological indicators[including immunoglobulin M(IgM)and immunoglobulin A(IgA)],and adverse reactions associated with different dosages of ursodeoxycholic acid treatment were observed.Results The effective rate of the low-dose group was 55%(23 cases were effec-tive),the effective rate of the high-dose group was 24%(10 cases were effective).The effective rate was signifi-cantly higher in the low-dose group than that in the high-dose group(x2=8.435,P<0.05).The levels of ALT,AST,ALP,GGT,TBIL and DBIL in the two groups after treatment were significantly lower than those before treatment(low-dose group:t=41.217,38.201,36.206,31.309,9.859,11.262,all P<0.01;high-dose group:t=36.334,30.622,30.422,24.247,5.589,4.167,all P<0.01).The levels of ALT,AST,ALP,GGT,TBIL and DBIL in the low-dose group were significantly lower than those in the high-dose group(t=9.456,12.917,1 1.166,7.930,7.469,4.854,all P<0.01).After treatment,the levels of IgM and IgA in the low-dose group were lower than those in the high-dose group(t=2.832.4.561,P<0.05).After treatment,the levels of GSH Px and SOD in the low-dose group were signif-icantly higher than those in the high-dose group(t=9.195,5.009,P<0.05),and the levels of MDA were significant-ly lower than those in the high-dose group(t=8.397,P<0.001).The incidence of adverse reactions in the low-dose group was 5%,while it was 19%in the high-dose group.The incidence of adverse reactions in the low-dose group was significantly lower than that in the high-dose group(x2=4.087,P=0.043).Conclusion Low-dose ursodeoxy-cholic acid is more effective and safe in the treatment of primary biliary cholangitis,and it can effectively improve liver function,reduce oxidative stress and enhance the immune function.

Ursodeoxycholic acidCholangitisClinical laboratory servicesImmunologic tests

单姝姝、蒋丽、王婷婷

展开 >

东阳市人民医院巍山分院消化内科,浙江东阳 322100

熊去氧胆酸 胆管炎 临床实检室检查服务 免疫学试验

2024

中国药物与临床
中国医院协会

中国药物与临床

影响因子:0.846
ISSN:1671-2560
年,卷(期):2024.24(1)
  • 21