首页|预防性应用头孢曲松和喹诺酮对高龄前列腺穿刺术患者全身炎症反应综合征的效果比较及影响因素

预防性应用头孢曲松和喹诺酮对高龄前列腺穿刺术患者全身炎症反应综合征的效果比较及影响因素

扫码查看
目的 探讨预防性应用头孢曲松与喹诺酮对高龄前列腺穿刺术患者全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)的预防效果及影响因素.方法 收集2021年3月至2022年10月在浙江省人民医院行前列腺穿刺术的600例患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析,根据穿刺前应用预防性抗菌药物的不同将患者分为A组(285例,头孢曲松)和B组(315例,喹诺酮)2组,比较A、B组对SIRS的预防效果.根据临床诊断结果将是否发生SIRS分为SIRS组(24例)、非SIRS组(576例),进行影响因素分析.结果 术后经临床诊断,A组SIRS发生率低于B组(25.0%和75.0%,P<0.05);SIRS组、非SIRS组前列腺体积>45 ml、术前留置尿管、合并糖尿病比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);经Logistic回归分析结果显示,前列腺体积>45 ml、术前留置尿管、合并糖尿病为高龄前列腺穿刺术患者发生SIRS的独立危险因素(P均<0.05).结论 相对于喹诺酮药物,预防性应用头孢曲松对高龄前列腺穿刺术患者SIRS的预防效果更好,前列腺体积>45 ml、术前留置尿管、合并糖尿病为高龄前列腺穿刺术患者发生SIRS的影响因素.
Preventive effects and influencing factors of ceftriaxone compared to quinolone in the treatment of sys-temic inflammatory response syndrome among elderly patients undergoing prostate puncture surgery
Objective To explore the preventive effect and influencing factors of ceftriaxone and quinolone on systemic inflammatory response syndrome(SIRS)among elderly patients undergoing prostate punc-ture surgery.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from 600 patients who underwent prostate puncture surgery at Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital from March 2021 to October 2022.The patients were divided into two groups based on the prophylactic antibiotics administered prior to the puncture:Group A(n=285,receiving ceftriaxone)and Group B(n=315,receiving quinolones).The prophylactic effects of ceftriaxone and quinolones on SIRS were compared between Group A and Group B.Furthermore,based on clinical diagnosis,the patients were classified into two groups:the SIRS group(n=24)and the non-SIRS group(n=576),and impact factor analysis were conducted.Results The incidence of SIRS was significantly lower in Group A compared to Group B(25.0%vs 75.0%,respectively)(P<0.05).There was a statistically significant difference between the SIRS group and the non-SIRS group in terms of the number of cases with a prostate volume greater than 45 ml,preoperative indwelling catheter,and diabetes(P<0.05).Logistic regression analysis indicated that a prostate volume exceeding 45 ml,preoperative indwelling catheter,and diabetes were independent risk factors for SIRS in elderly patients undergoing prostate puncture(P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with quinolones,the prophylactic administration of ceftriaxone demonstrates a superior effect in preventing SIRS among elderly patients undergoing prostate puncture.A prostate volume exceeding 45 ml,preoperative indwelling of a urinary catheter,and diabetes mellitus all play significant roles in influencing the occurrence of SIRS in this patient population.

CeftriaxoneQuinolonesProstate puncture surgeryInflammatory response syndrome

沈利娜、邵海燕、骆晓婷、陈珊

展开 >

浙江省人民医院泌尿外科,浙江杭州 314408

头孢曲松 喹诺酮类 前列腺穿刺术 炎症反应综合征

2024

中国药物与临床
中国医院协会

中国药物与临床

影响因子:0.846
ISSN:1671-2560
年,卷(期):2024.24(5)