首页|厄贝沙坦与奥美沙坦酯对高血压病的疗效及对肝肾功能影响

厄贝沙坦与奥美沙坦酯对高血压病的疗效及对肝肾功能影响

扫码查看
目的 探讨厄贝沙坦与奥美沙坦酯联合常规药物治疗高血压病的疗效及对肝肾功能的影响。方法 以屏南县医院2021年1月至2023年12月入院治疗110例高血压病患者为研究对象。根据不同的治疗方案分组,其中55例患者接受厄贝沙坦联合常规药物治疗为对照组,另外55例患者接受奥美沙坦酯联合常规药物治疗为观察组。对比2组临床治疗总有效率、血压水平、碱性磷酸酶(ALP)、天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)、丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、微量白蛋白、血肌酐、不良反应发生情况。结果 观察组治疗总有效率(96。4%)高于对照组(83。6%)(P<0。05)。治疗前,2组日间收缩压、日间舒张压、夜间收缩压、夜间舒张压水平比较差异无统计学意义(P>0。05);治疗后,2组上述血压水平均降低,观察组[(127±8)mmHg、(85±7)mmHg、(121±7)mmHg、(81±6)mmHg]比对照组[(133±8)mmHg、(92±7)mmHg、(129±8)mmHg、(89±6)mmHg)]低(P<0。05)。治疗前,2组ALP、AST、ALT、微量白蛋白、血肌酐比较差异无统计学意义(P>0。05);治疗后,2组上述指标均降低,观察组(102。6±6。3)U/L、(24。3±2。6)U/L、(15。6±1。1)U/L、(25。9±3。8)mg/L、(80±8)mg/dl]比对照组[(121。5±7。6)U/L、(31。5±2。8)U/L、(17。6±1。3)U/L、(31。6±2。3)mg/L、(87±7)mg/dl]低(P<0。05)。观察组头痛、恶心、腹泻、皮疹、关节疼痛、麻木、疲劳等不良反应总发生率(10。9%)与对照组比较(14。6%)差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。结论 与厄贝沙坦相比,奥美沙坦酯治疗高血压病的效果更好,可有效控制血压水平,对肝肾功能具有较好的保护作用,且不会增加不良反应发生风险。
Comparison of the therapeutic effects of irbesartan and olmesartan medoxomil combined with conven-tional drugs on hypertension and their impact on liver and kidney function
Objective To investigate the efficacy comparison of irbesartan and olmesartan medoxomil combined with conventional drugs in the treatment of hypertension and their effects on liver and kidney function.Methods A total of 110 patients with hypertension were selected as research objects in Pingnan County General Hospital.The patient admitted to Pingnan County General Hospital,from January 2021 to December 2023.Accord-ing to different treatment plans,a total of 110 patients were divided into a control group and an observation group,with 55 cases in each group.The control group received treatment with irbesartan combined with conventional drugs,while the observation group received treatment with olmesartan medoxomil combined with conventional drugs.Compare the total effective rate of clinical treatment,blood pressure levels,alkaline phosphatase(ALP),as-partate aminotransferase(AST),alanine aminotransferase(ALT),microalbumin,serum creatinine,and adverse re-actions between the two groups.Results The total effective rate of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group(96.4%vs 83.6%)(P<0.05).Before treatment,there was no significant difference in the levels of daytime systolic blood pressure,daytime diastolic blood pressure,nighttime systolic blood pressure,and nighttime diastolic blood pressure between the two groups(P>0.05).After treatment,the above blood pressure levels were significantly reduced in both groups,but the observation group was lower than the control group[(127±8)mmHg,(85±7)mmHg,(121±7)mmHg,(81±6)mmHg vs(133±8)mmHg,(92±7)mmHg,(129±8)mmHg,(89±6)mmHg](P<0.05).Before treatment,there was no significant difference in alkaline phosphatase,aspartate amino-transferase,alanine aminotransferase,microalbumin,and serum creatinine between the two groups(P>0.05).After treatment,the above indicators in both groups were significantly reduced,but the observation group was lower than the control group[(102.6±6.3)U/L,(24.3±2.6)U/L,(15.6±1.1)U/L,(25.9±3.8)mg/L,(80±8)mg/dl vs(121.5±7.6)U/L,(31.5±2.8)U/L,(17.6±1.3)U/L,(31.6±2.3)mg/L,(87±7)mg/dl](P<0.05).The total incidence of adverse reactions such as headache,nausea,diarrhea,rash,joint pain,numbness,fatigue,etc.in the observation group was not sig-nificantly different from that in the control group(10.9%vs 14.6%)(P>0.05).Conclusions Compared with irbe-sartan,olmesartan medoxomil is more effective in treating hypertension.It can effectively control blood pressure levels,protect liver and kidney function,and does not increase the risk of adverse reactions.

IrbesartanOmesartan medoxomilHypertensionTreatment outcome

陈翎

展开 >

屏南县总医院(屏南县医院心内科),福建宁德 352300

厄贝沙坦 奥美沙坦酯 高血压 治疗效果

2024

中国药物与临床
中国医院协会

中国药物与临床

影响因子:0.846
ISSN:1671-2560
年,卷(期):2024.24(15)