首页|麻杏二三汤化裁联合常规西药治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期患者疗效及对气道炎症的影响

麻杏二三汤化裁联合常规西药治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期患者疗效及对气道炎症的影响

扫码查看
目的 研究麻杏二三汤化裁联合常规西药治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)急性加重期患者疗效及对气道炎症的影响。方法 选取浙江省绍兴市中医院2021年1月至2024年1月收治的80例COPD急性加重期患者,按照不同的治疗方法将其分为西药组(33例,采用常规西药治疗)和中西药结合组(47例,在西药组基础上加用麻杏二三汤化裁治疗),2组疗程均为10 d,对比2组患者治疗前后的临床疗效、肺功能状态、气道炎症及不良反应。结果 中西药结合组临床有效率为(98%)高于西药组(79%)(x2=4。727,P<0。05);中西药结合组患者治疗后咳嗽、咳痰、呼吸不畅、喘息等证候评分分别为[(1。94±0。36)分、(1。32±0。43)分、(1。87±0。48)分、(1。85±0。37)分]均低于西药组[(2。36±0。43)分、(1。94±0。56)分、(2。13±0。41)分、(2。21±0。45)分](t=4。739、5。599、2。529、3。916,P均<0。05);治疗后,中西药结合组患者的动脉血氧分压(PaO2)和血氧饱和度(SaO2)分别为[(80。6±7。7)mmHg、(95。2±2。7)%]均高于西药组[(76。3±7。2)mmHg、(93。7±2。4)%](t=2。524、2。497,P 均<0。05),二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)为(50±5)mmHg,低于西药组的(54±5)mmHg(t=3。192,P<0。05);治疗后,中西药结合组患者的肺活量(VC)、第1秒用力呼吸容积(FEV1)和呼吸峰值流速(PEF)分别为[(2。08±0。43)L、(1。81±0。20)L、(367±36)L/min]均高于西药组[(1。73±0。32)L、(1。65±0。24)L、(335±36)L/min](t=3。965、3。242、2。846,P均<0。05);治疗后,中西药结合组患者的C反应蛋白(CRP)、几丁质酶-3样蛋白1(CHI3L1)、缺氧诱导因子-1α(HIF-1α)、白细胞介素 6(IL-6)和白介素 10(IL-10)分别为[(22。3±2。2)mg/L、(41±4)μg/L、(60±15)μg/L、(4。4±1。0)ng/L、(4。5±1。2)pg/ml]均低于西药组[(32。4±2。7)mg/L、(49±4)μg/L、(80±16)μg/L、(5。4±1。4)ng/L、(6。3±1。4)pg/ml](t=18。545、8。985、2。991、4。351、6。134,P均<0。05),中西药结合组患者用药不良反应发生率(9%)与西药组(6。06%)对比差异无统计学意义(x2=0。168,P>0。05)。结论 麻杏二三汤化裁联合常规西药治疗COPD急性加重患者的效果显著,能有效缓解患者症状,改善肺功能状态及气道炎症,安全性好,值得临床推广及应用。
Effects of modified maxing ersan decoction combined with conventional western medicine on patients with acute exacerbation of COPD and its influence on airway inflammation
Objective To study the effects of modified maxing ersan decoction combined with conven-tional western medicine on patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD)and its influence on airway inflammation.Methods A total of 80 patients with acute exacerbation of COPD in the Shaoxing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2021 to January 2024,According to the different treatment methods,they were divided into a western medicine group(n=33,conventional western medicine)and a Chinese-western medicine group(n=47,modified maxing ersan decoction on the basis of the western medicine group)according to the principles of non-randomized clinical concurrent control study and patient voluntarism.The courses of treatment for both groups were 10 days.The clinical efficacy,pulmonary function status,airway inflammation,and adverse reactions of the patients before and after treatment were compared between the two groups.Results The clinical effective rate of the Chinese-western medicine group was significantly higher than that of the western medicine group(98%vs 79%,x2=4.727,P<0.05).After treatment,the symptom scores of cough,expectoration,dyspnea,and wheezing in the Chinese-western medicine group were significantly lower than those in the western medicine group[(1.94±0.36),(1.32±0.43),(1.87±0.48),(1.85±0.37)vs(2.36±0.43),(1.94±0.56),(2.13±0.41),(2.21±0.45)],(t=4.739,5.599,2.529,3.916,all P<0.05).After treatment,the arterial partial pressure of oxygen(PaO2)and oxygen saturation(SaO2)in the Chinese-western medicine group were significantly higher than those in the western medicine group[(80.6±7.7)mmHg,(95.2±2.7)%vs(76.3±7.2)mmHg,(93.7±2.4)%](t=2.524,2.497,both P<0.05).The partial pressure of carbon dioxide(PaCO2)in the Chinese-western medicine group was significantly lower than that in the western medicine group[(50±5)mmHg vs(54±5)mmHg](t=3.192,P<0.05).After treatment,the vital capacity(VC),forced expiratory volume in 1 second(FEV 1),and peak expiratory flow(PEF)in the Chinese-western medicine group were significantly higher than those in the western medicine group[(2.08±0.43)L,(1.81±0.20)L,and(367±36)L/min vs(1.73±0.32)L,(1.65±0.24)L,and(335±36)Umin](t=3.965,3.242,2.846,all P<0.05).After treatment,the levels of C-reactive protein(CRP),chitinase-3-like protein 1(CHI3L1),hypoxia-inducible factor-1α(HIF-1α),interleukin-6(IL-6),and interleukin-10(IL-10)in the Chinese-western medicine group were significantly lower than those in the western medicine group[(22.3±2.2)mg/L,(41±4)μg/L,(60±15)μg/L,(4.4±1.0)ng/L,and(4.5±1.2)pg/ml]vs[(32.4±2.7)mg/L,(49±4)μg/L,(80±16)μg/L,(5.4±1.4)ng/L,and(6.3±1.4)pg/ml](t=18.545,8.985,2.991,4.351,6.134,all P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse drug reactions between the two groups(9%vs 6%,x2=0.168,P>0.05).Conclusion Modified maxing ersan decoction combined with conventional western medicine has a signifi-cant effect in the treatment of patients with acute exacerbation of COPD.It can effectively alleviate the symptoms,improve pulmonary function and aiiway inflammation,with good safety.

Maxing Ersan decoctionPulmonary disease,Chronic obstructiveBlood gas analysisPul-monary functionTreatment outcomeInflammation

何薇、李慧娇

展开 >

绍兴市中医院呼吸科,浙江绍兴 312000

麻杏二三汤 肺疾病,慢性阻塞性 血气分析 肺功能 治疗效果 炎症

2024

中国药物与临床
中国医院协会

中国药物与临床

影响因子:0.846
ISSN:1671-2560
年,卷(期):2024.24(17)