首页|不同剂量尿激酶治疗冠心病介入术后下肢深静脉血栓形成患者的近期疗效及安全性研究

不同剂量尿激酶治疗冠心病介入术后下肢深静脉血栓形成患者的近期疗效及安全性研究

扫码查看
目的 分析不同剂量尿激酶治疗冠心病介入术后下肢深静脉血栓形成患者的近期疗效及安全性。方法 选择河南省直第三人民医院80例接受尿激酶经导管溶栓治疗的冠心病介入术后下肢深静脉血栓形成患者作为研究对象,按患者接受的治疗方法分为A组和B组,各40例;A组尿激酶使用剂量为100万U/d,B组尿激酶使用剂量为50万U/d;持续治疗7 d,随访6个月,观察2组治疗前后的不同部位患肢周径、血清纤维蛋白原(FBG)、D-二聚体(D-D),比较2组溶栓率、消肿率、不良反应发生率,根据患肢静脉血栓消长和静脉内血流情况,综合评价临床疗效。结果 A组治疗后踝上5 cm、膝下10 cm和膝上10 cm患肢周径均小于B组(P<0。05);A组治疗后血清FBG、D-D水平均低于B组(P<0。05);2组患者均获得随访,A组溶栓率、消肿率均高于B组P<0。05);2组临床总有效率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0。05);A组临床总显效率高于B组(P<0。05);2组均未见死亡病例和严重脏器出血,以便血、血尿、牙龈出血等轻微不良反应为主,停药后均显著缓解,组间不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。结论 尿激酶100万U/d治疗冠心病介入术后下肢深静脉血栓形成的溶栓疗效优于50万U/d,且未明显增加出血风险,值得临床予以重视。
Short-term efficacy and safety of different doses of urokinase in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis of lower extremities after coronary intervention in patients with coronary heart disease
Objective To analyze the short-term efficacy and safety of different doses of urokinase in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis of lower extremities after coronary intervention in patients with coronary heart disease.Methods A total of 80 patients with deep venous thrombosis of lower extremities after coronary interven-sion treated with urokinase catheter thrombolysis in the Third People's Hospital of Henan Province were selected as the study subjects.They were divided into group A and group B according to treatment methods,with 40 cases in each group.The dose of urokinase in group A was 1 million U/d,and the dose of urokinase in group B was 500 000 U/d.The treatment lasted for 7 days,and the patients were followed up for 6 months.The circumference of the affected limbs,serum fibrinogen(FBG),D-dimer(D-D)in different parts before and after treatment were ob-served in the two groups.Thrombolysis rate,detumescence rate,and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.According to the growth and decline of venous thrombosis in the affected limbs and the blood flow in the veins,the clinical efficacy was comprehensively evaluated.Results The circumference of af-fected limbs at 5 cm above the ankle,10 cm below the knee,and 10cm above the knee in group A were all smaller than those in group B(P<0.05).The levels of serum FBG and D-D in group A after treatment were lower than those in group B(P<0.05).Both groups of patients were followed up.The thrombolysis rate and detumescence rate in group A were higher than those in group B(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the total clini-cal effective rate between the two groups(P>0.05).The total clinical marked effective rate in group A was higher than that in group B(P<0.05).No deaths or severe organ bleeding was observed in either group,and the main ad-verse reactions were mild,such as hematochezia,hematuria,and gingival bleeding,which were significantly re-lieved after drug with-drawal.There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion The thrombolytic effect of 1 million U/d urokinase in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis of lower extremities after coronary intervention is better than that of 500 thousand U/d,and does not significantly increase the risk of bleeding,which edserves clinical attention.

Coronary diseaseVenous thrombosisUrkinaseFibrinolytic agentsHemorrhage

王铎

展开 >

河南省直第三人民医院心脏中心,河南郑州 450000

冠心病 静脉血栓形成 尿激酶 纤维蛋白溶解药 出血

2024

中国药物与临床
中国医院协会

中国药物与临床

影响因子:0.846
ISSN:1671-2560
年,卷(期):2024.24(20)