首页|复方聚乙二醇电解质散联合西甲硅油在肠镜检查肠道准备中的应用及对病变检出率的影响

复方聚乙二醇电解质散联合西甲硅油在肠镜检查肠道准备中的应用及对病变检出率的影响

扫码查看
目的 探究复方聚乙二醇电解质散联合西甲硅油应用于肠镜检查肠道准备中的应用效果。方法 回顾性分析2023年1月至2023年12月浙江省金华市人民医院收治的接受肠镜检查的研究对象共计300例,根据研究对象接受干预方法的不同,将上述研究对象分为常规干预组(n=166)以及联合干预组(n=134),常规干预组接受复方聚乙二醇电解质散;联合干预组接受复方聚乙二醇电解质散联合西甲硅油;比较2组研究对象接受干预后的进镜时间、退镜时间、接受检查的总时间、研究对象在不同肠段的波士顿肠道准备评分(BBPS)得分和总分分值、联合干预组研究对象的不良反应发生率以及2组研究对象肠道腺瘤的检出率,锯齿状病变的检出率,结肠早癌的检出率。结果 联合干预组研究对象的进镜时间、退镜时间以及接受检查的总时间分别为(7。0±1。6)min、(7。1±1。1)min、(13。5±1。7)min;短于常规干预组(t=13。740、15。653、19。619;P均<0。01);与此同时,联合干预组患者在不同肠段的BBPS评分和总分分值显著高于常规干预组(t=14。990、12。698、6。884、38。763;P均<0。01);最后,对比结果显示,联合干预组研究对象的不良反应发生率低于常规干预组(X2=6。139;P=0。013);与此同时,将上述2组研究对象的肠镜检查结果同最终病理学检查结果进行对比,联合干预组研究对象肠道腺瘤的检出率,锯齿状病变的检出率,结肠早癌的检出率高于常规干预组,差异有统计学意义(X2=3。972、4。886、4。062;P=0。046、0。027、0。044)。结论 复方聚乙二醇电解质散联合西甲硅油应能够缩短肠镜检查时间、提升波士顿肠道准备评分同时降低不良反应发生率,具有较高的应用价值。
Application of compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder combined with simethicone in bowel preparation for colonoscopy and its effect on lesion detection rate
Objective To explore the application effect of compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte pow-der combined with simethicone in bowel preparation for colonoscopy.Methods A retrospective analysis was con-ducted on a total of 300 patients who underwent colonoscopy at Jinhua People's Hospital from January to Decem-ber 2023.According to different intervention methods,they were divided into routine intervention group ( n=166,compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder) and combined intervention group ( n=134,compound polyethy-lene glycol electrolyte powder combined with simethicone).The endoscope placement time,removal time,total ex-amination time,scores and total score of Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) at different intestinal segments,the incidence of adverse reactions,the detection rate of intestinal adenoma,the detection rate of serrated lesions and the detection rate of early colon cancer were compared.Results The insertion time,withdrawal time and total time of examination in the combined intervention group were (7.0±1.6) min,(7.1±1.1) min and (13.5±1.7) min,re-spectively.It was significantly shorter than that of the conventional intervention group ( t=13.740,15.653,19.619;all P<0.01);At the same time,the BBPS scores and total scores of patients in different intestinal segments in the combined intervention group were significantly higher(t=14.990,12.698,6.884,38.763;all P<0.01).Finally,the comparison results showed that the incidence of adverse reactions in the combined intervention group was signifi-cantly lower,and the difference was statistically significant ( X2=6.139;P=0.013).At the same time,the colonoscopy results of the above two groups of subjects were compared with the final pathological examination re-sults.The detection rate of intestinal adenoma,the detection rate of serrated lesions,and the detection rate of ear-ly colon cancer in the combined intervention group were higher than those in the conventional intervention group.The difference was statistically significant (X2=3.972,4.886,4.062;P=0.046,0.027,0.044).Conclusion The combination of compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder and silicone oil can shorten the colonoscopy ex-amination time,improve the Boston bowel preparation score,and reduce the incidence of adverse reactions,which has high application value.

EnteroscopyCompound polyethylene glycol electrolyte powderSimeticoneScore of Boston bowel preparation

胡丽瑜、施敏

展开 >

金华市人民医院内镜中心,浙江金华 321000

肠镜检查 复方聚乙二醇电解质散 西甲硅油 波士顿肠道准备评分

2024

中国药物与临床
中国医院协会

中国药物与临床

影响因子:0.846
ISSN:1671-2560
年,卷(期):2024.24(23)