中国药物与临床2024,Vol.24Issue(24) :1595-1600.DOI:10.11655/zgywylc2024.24.007

康柏西普与雷珠单抗分别联合激光光凝治疗视网膜静脉阻塞合并黄斑水肿的疗效对比

Comparative analysis of the efficacy of conbercept or ranibizumab combined with laser photocoagulation in the treatment of retinal vein occlusion with macular edema

李新 陈战巧 柳小梅
中国药物与临床2024,Vol.24Issue(24) :1595-1600.DOI:10.11655/zgywylc2024.24.007

康柏西普与雷珠单抗分别联合激光光凝治疗视网膜静脉阻塞合并黄斑水肿的疗效对比

Comparative analysis of the efficacy of conbercept or ranibizumab combined with laser photocoagulation in the treatment of retinal vein occlusion with macular edema

李新 1陈战巧 1柳小梅1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 丽水市中心医院眼科,浙江丽水 323000
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 对比分析康柏西普与雷珠单抗分别联合激光光凝治疗视网膜静脉阻塞(RVO)合并黄斑水肿的临床效果.方法 选取2022年1月至2023年11月浙江省丽水市中心医院眼科收治的RVO合并黄斑水肿的患者87例,根据不同的治疗方式分为康柏西普组(康柏西普联合激光光凝治疗,46例)和雷珠单抗组(雷珠单抗联合激光光凝治疗,41例),治疗3个月后评估2组患者的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、黄斑中心凹视网膜厚度(CMT)、炎症因子水平[血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)、单核细胞趋化蛋白-1(MCP-1)和白细胞介素-6(IL-6)]、并发症发生情况和重复用药率.结果 治疗1、2、3个月后2组的BCVA水平、CMT逐渐降低(P<0.05),但组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);2组治疗后的VEGF、MCP-1、IL-6水平均降低(P<0.05),组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);康柏西普组并发症总发生率为8.7%,雷珠单抗组为12.2%,2组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);康柏西普组重复用药率为2.2%,低于雷珠单抗组的14.6%,2组差异无统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 康柏西普与雷珠单抗分别联合激光光凝治疗RVO合并黄斑水肿疗效接近,均能提高患者的视力水平,改善黄斑水肿和炎症因子水平,并发症发生率低,安全性高.

Abstract

Objective To compare and analyze the clinical effect of conbercept or ranibizumab combined with laser photocoagulation in the treatment of retinal vein occlusion (RVO) with macular edema (ME). Methods A total of 87 patients with RVO and ME admitted to Lishui Central Hospital,from January 2022 to November 2023 were selected and divided into a conbercept group (treated with conbercept combined with laser photocoagu-lation,n=46) and a ranibizumab group (treated with ranibizumab combined with laser photocoagulation,n=41) based on different treatment methods. After 3 months of treatment,the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA),central macular thickness (CMT),levels of inflammatory factors[vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF),monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1),and interleukin-6 (IL-6)],occurrence of complications,and rate of repeat med-ication were evaluated in both groups. Results After 1,2,and 3 months of treatment,the BCVA and CMT grad-ually decreased in both groups (P<0.05),but there were no significant differences between the groups (P>0.05). The levels of VEGF,MCP-1,and IL-6 decreased after treatment in both groups (P<0.05),with no significant dif-ferences between the groups (P>0.05). The total incidence of complications was 8.7%in the conbercept group and 12.2% in the ranibizumab group,with no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The rate of re-peated medication was 2.2% in the conbercept group,which was lower than the 14.6% in the ranibizumab group (P<0.05). Conclusion Both conbercept and ranibizumab,each combined with laser photocoagulation,are treat-ment options for RVO with ME. They exhibit similar efficacy,improving patients' visual acuity,alleviating macular edema,and reducing inflammatory cytokine levels,with low complication rates and high safety.

关键词

康柏西普/雷珠单抗/激光光凝治疗/视网膜静脉闭塞/黄斑水肿/治疗结果

Key words

Conbercept/Ranibizumab/Laser photocoagulation treatment/Retinal vein occlusion/Macular edema/Treatment outcome

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
中国药物与临床
中国医院协会

中国药物与临床

影响因子:0.846
ISSN:1671-2560
段落导航相关论文