首页|不同假体在膝关节骨关节炎患者全膝关节置换术中的应用效果对比

不同假体在膝关节骨关节炎患者全膝关节置换术中的应用效果对比

扫码查看
目的:对比膝关节骨关节炎(KOA)患者全膝关节置换术中采用不同假体的效果.方法:回顾性选取中国人民解放军联勤保障部队庐山康复疗养中心 2020 年 4 月—2023 年 4 月收治的 80 例接受全膝关节置换术治疗的KOA患者的病历资料进行研究,依据全膝关节置换术中采用的假体类型将其分为A组(固定平台假体)和B组(高屈曲旋转平台假体),各 40 例.对比两组围手术期相关指标(手术时间、术中出血量、引流管拔除时间、住院时间)、膝关节功能[Lysholm膝关节评分、西大略和麦克马斯特大学(WOMAC)骨关节炎指数评分]、炎症因子[白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、C反应蛋白(CRP)]及术后并发症发生情况.结果:两组围手术期相关指标对比,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).术后 3 个月,两组Lysholm膝关节评分均显著上升,且B组高于A组,两组WOMAC骨关节炎指数评分均显著下降,且B组低于A组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).出院前 1 d,两组IL-6、CRP均显著下降,且B组均低于A组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).两组术后并发症发生率对比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论:高屈曲旋转平台假体与固定平台假体均可达到良好手术效果,但相较于固定平台假体,高屈曲旋转平台假体能更显著提高KOA患者全膝关节置换术后膝关节功能,且可改善术后炎症状况.
Comparison of the Application Effect of Different Prostheses in Total Knee Arthroplasty for Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis
Objective:To compare the effects of different prostheses on total knee arthroplasty in patients with knee osteoarthritis(KOA).Method:The medical records of 80 patients with KOA treated in Lushan Rehabilitation and Rehabilitation Center of the Joint Support Force of the Chinese People's Liberation Army from April 2020 to April 2023 were retrospectively selected for research,and they were divided into group A(fixed platform prosthesis)and group B(high flexion rotating platform prosthesis)according to the types of prostheses used in total knee arthroplasty,with 40 cases in each group.The perioperative related indicator(operation time,intraoperative bleeding volume,drainage tube removal time,hospitalization time),knee joint function[Lysholm knee joint score,Western Ontario and McMaster University(WOMAC)osteoarthritis index score],inflammatory factors[interleukin-6(IL-6),C reactive protein(CRP)]and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.Result:There were no significant differences in perioperative related indicator between the two groups(P>0.05).3 months after surgery,Lysholm knee joint scores in both groups were significantly increased,and that in group B was higher than that in group A,and the WOMAC osteoarthritis index scores in both groups were significantly decreased,and that in group B was lower than that in group A,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).1 day before discharge,IL-6 and CRP in both groups were significantly decreased,and those in group B were lower than those in group A,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:Both high flexion rotating platform prosthesis and fixed platform prosthesis can achieve good surgical results,but compared with fixed platform prosthesis,high flexion rotating platform prosthesis can significantly improve knee joint function after total knee arthroplasty in patients with KOA,and can improve postoperative inflammation condition.

Knee osteoarthritisTotal knee arthroplastyProsthesesKnee joint function

李栋梁、崔卓航、蒋永佳、张鸿飞、刘敏

展开 >

中国人民解放军联勤保障部队庐山康复疗养中心(九江市 171 医院)骨科 江西 九江 332000

九江学院附属医院骨科 江西 九江 332000

膝关节骨关节炎 全膝关节置换术 假体 膝关节功能

2024

中国医学创新
中国保健协会

中国医学创新

影响因子:1.706
ISSN:1674-4985
年,卷(期):2024.21(11)
  • 20