首页|团体认知行为疗法联合曼陀罗绘画干预对青少年抑郁症患者应对方式和自伤行为的影响

团体认知行为疗法联合曼陀罗绘画干预对青少年抑郁症患者应对方式和自伤行为的影响

扫码查看
目的:探究团体认知行为疗法(G-CBT)联合曼陀罗绘画干预对青少年抑郁症患者应对方式和自伤行为的影响.方法:选取 2020 年 3 月—2022 年 3 月上饶市第三人民医院诊治的 80 例青少年抑郁症患者,随机分为对照组(施行G-CBT干预)40 例及观察组(施行G-CBT联合曼陀罗绘画干预)40 例.评价两组抑郁程度、应对方式、自伤行为及生活质量.结果:干预 8 周后,两组汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评分均降低,且与对照组(14.48±3.97)分比较,观察组(11.16±3.12)分显著降低(P<0.05).干预 8 周内,两组自伤次数均减少,且与对照组(11.48±3.47)次比较,观察组(8.16±2.53)次显著少(P<0.05);干预 8 周内,观察组自伤方式种类分布与对照组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).干预 8 周后,两组简易应对方式问卷(SCSQ)中积极健康方式评分均升高,消极病态方式评分均降低,且与对照组(25.76±3.84)、(15.58±3.38)分比较,观察组积极健康方式评分(28.04±3.67)分显著升高,消极病态方式评分(12.39±3.35)分显著降低(P<0.05).干预 8 周后,两组世界卫生组织生存质量测定量表(WHOQOL-BREF)的生理、心理、社会关系、环境方面评分均升高,且与对照组(11.78±2.24)、(12.72±2.71)、(13.72±2.18)、(12.47±1.94)分比较,观察组(13.82±2.11)、(14.32±2.52)、(15.91±2.29)、(14.43±2.01)分均显著高(P<0.05).结论:G-CBT联合曼陀罗绘画干预青少年抑郁症,可减轻患者抑郁程度,调节患者情绪,改善患者自伤行为与应对方式,提高生活质量水平.
Impact of Group Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Combined with Mandala Drawing Intervention on Coping Modes and Self-injurious Behavior in Adolescents Patients with Depression
Objective:To investigate the impact of group cognitive behavioral therapy(G-CBT)combined with Mandala drawing intervention on coping modes and self-injurious behavior in adolescents patients with depression.Method:A total of 80 adolescent patients with depression who were diagnosed and treated in Shangrao Third People's Hospital from March 2020 to March 2022 were selected,and randomly divided into a control group(40 cases receiving G-CBT intervention)and an observation group(40 cases receiving G-CBT combined with Mandala drawing intervention).Depression degree,coping modes,self-injurious behavior and quality of life of the two groups were evaluated.Result:After 8 weeks of intervention,the Hamilton depression scale(HAMD)scores of both groups were decreased,and the score of the observation group(11.16±3.12)points,which was significantly lower than(14.48±3.97)points of the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).During 8 weeks of intervention,the frequency of self injuries in both groups were decreased,and the frequency in the observation group[(8.16±2.53)times],which was significantly less than(11.48±3.47)times in the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Intervention within 8 weeks,there were statistically significant differences in the types of self injuries between the two groups(P<0.05).After 8 weeks of intervention,positive coping mode scores of both groups were increased and negative coping mode scores were decreased,compared with(25.76±3.84)and(15.58±3.38)points in the control group,positive coping mode score(28.04±3.67)points in the observation group was significantly higher,and negative coping mode score(12.39±3.35)points was significantly lower,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).After 8 weeks of intervention,the physiological,psychological,social communication and environmental scores of both groups were increased,compared with(11.78±2.24),(12.72±2.71),(13.72±2.18)and(12.47±1.94)points in the control group,(13.82±2.11),(14.32±2.52),(15.91±2.29)and(14.43±2.01)points in the observation group were higher,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:G-CBT combined with Mandala drawing intervention can alleviate depression,regulate emotions,reduce self-injurious behavior,and improve coping modes and quality of life of adolescents with depression.

Group cognitive behavioral therapyMandala drawing interventionAdolescentDepression

申芳

展开 >

上饶市第三人民医院精神科 江西 上饶 334000

团体认知行为疗法 曼陀罗绘画干预 青少年 抑郁症

2024

中国医学创新
中国保健协会

中国医学创新

影响因子:1.706
ISSN:1674-4985
年,卷(期):2024.21(11)
  • 21