首页|宫腔镜与阴式修补术治疗剖宫产切口憩室致异常子宫出血患者的效果比较

宫腔镜与阴式修补术治疗剖宫产切口憩室致异常子宫出血患者的效果比较

扫码查看
目的 比较剖宫产切口憩室(PCSD)致异常子宫出血患者采用宫腔镜与阴式修补术治疗的效果。方法 选择2020年6月至2021年6月来洛阳安和医院治疗的PCSD致异常子宫出血患者66例,其中35例采用宫腔镜治疗记为宫腔镜组,31例采用阴式修补术治疗记为阴式修补术组。比较两组治疗PCSD临床疗效,比较两组围手术期相关指标、不同时间点月经经期天数及月经周期,记录术后3个月内两组并发症发生情况;随访18个月,记录两组妊娠及足月活产情况。结果 两组的总有效率分别为94。29%、90。32%,差异无统计学意义(P>0。05);宫腔镜组术中出血量少于阴式修补术组,手术时间、住院时间低于阴式修补术组(P<0。05),两组胃肠功能恢复时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0。05);术后1、6个月,两组的月经经期天数均短于术前(P<0。05),术后1个月,两组的月经经期天数比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0。05),而术后6个月时阴式修补术组的月经经期天数较宫腔镜组短(P<0。05);术前、术后1、6个月时,两组的月经周期比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0。05);随访18个月,两组妊娠发生率分别为51。43%、67。74%,差异无统计学意义(P>0。05);阴式修补术组足月活产90。32%,高于宫腔镜组的65。71%(P<0。05);两组术后并发症发生率为5。71%、9。68%,差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。结论 宫腔镜与阴式修补术治疗PCSD致异常子宫出血均具有良好效果,宫腔镜手术有利于患者早期恢复,而阴式修补术则具有较好的远期疗效,临床应用时需根据患者自身情况及意愿进行选择。
Comparison on curative effect of hysteroscopy and vaginal repair in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding induced by PCSD
[Objective]To compare the curative effect of hysteroscopy and vaginal repair on patients with abnormal uterine bleeding induced by previous cesarean scar defect(PCSD).[Methods]A total of 66 patients with PCSD induced abnormal uterine bleeding treated in Anhe Hospital were enrolled between June 2020 and June 2021,including 35 cases in hysteroscopy group and 31 cases in vaginal repair group.The clinical curative effect,perioperative indexes,menstrual duration and cycle in the two groups were compared.The occurrence of complications in both groups within 3 months after surgery was recorded.All patients were followed up for 18 months to record pregnancy and full-term live births.[Results]The total response rates in the two groups were similar(94.29%vs.90.32%,P>0.05).The intraoperative blood loss was less in hysteroscopy group than vaginal repair group,operation time and hospitalization time were significantly shorter in hysteroscopy group(P<0.05).The recovery time of gastrointestinal function in the two groups was similar(P>0.05).At 1 month and 6 months after surgery,menstrual duration was shortened in both groups(P<0.05).At 1 month after surgery,menstrual duration in the two groups was similar(P>0.05).At 6 months after surgery,menstrual duration was shorter in vaginal repair group than hysteroscopy group(P<0.05).Before surgery and at 1 month and 6 months after surgery,menstrual cycle in the two groups was similar(P>0.05).After 18 months of follow-up,pregnancy rates in the two groups were similar(51.43%vs.67.74%,P>0.05).The full-term live birth rate was higher in vaginal repair group than hysteroscopy group(90.32%vs.65.71%,P<0.05).The incidence of postoperative complications in the two groups was similar(5.71%vs.9.68%,P>0.05).[Conclusion]Both hysteroscopy and vaginal repair have good curative effect on abnormal uterine bleeding induced by PCSD.Hysteroscopy is conducive to early recovery of patients,while vaginal repair has better long-term curative effect.In clinical application,they should be selected according to the own situations and willingness of patients.

hysteroscopyvaginal repairprevious cesarean scar defectabnormal uterine bleedingcurative effect

刘金会、耿艳霞、田岩岩

展开 >

洛阳安和医院产科,河南洛阳 471000

宫腔镜 阴式修补术 剖宫产切口憩室 异常子宫出血 疗效

2024

中国医学工程
中国医药生物技术协会 卫生部肝胆肠外科研究中心

中国医学工程

影响因子:0.504
ISSN:1672-2019
年,卷(期):2024.32(4)
  • 14